Why are Democrats trying to give illegals voters rights?

Question

77% of New Yorkers said NO!

Yet the NY Governor is dead set to give illegals a drivers license. And Hillary is all for it.

Getting a NY license allows illegals to go back to their state and trade it in for that states license, no questions asked. It is a legal ID.

This ID can then be used to register to vote. There is not much else needed to qualify.

Are Democrats really this unscrupulous? Willing to give away our nation for a few million more votes.

And what about the influence Mexico, the home nation to most illegals, will have over our politicians and courts?

morden: then why is the Governor doing this? State and national polls show that this is not what we want. It is about getting new voters. Stop lying to yourself. This is as low as it gets.

To everyone else that can't admit the truth: If not for votes, they why is this happening? And don't give us that BS about safety.

queen: are you really this gullible? You must be really young not to understand the motives behind political moves like this.

EDIT: Queen: Sorry to have hit such a nerve., but it was Lou Dobbs (CNN) and C. Matthews (MSNBC) who suggested that NY Dems are doing this for disingenuous reasons. And they are. This does nothing for Americans. It only fortifies the Democrats voter base.

Answer 1

Whoa, I am a democrat and I can not justify this action of Elliot shitzer. FYI they are "supposed" to be limited drivers licenses.
I still think its jacked up and I disagree, and I liked hearing about the workers at the dmv in NY complying but in return using the info provided to report illegals.

Answer 2

Yes. I have been doing research on here and figured out that it's 70% conservative/rep and 30% liberal/demo. I have done the same thing with thousands* with the same results which means "voter fraud".

After all that work the nxt thing I know "liberal" New York cmes out even more!

You know if a question goes into the communtiy and you can vote on it. I don't know if Yahoo set it up this way, you can go back to any question you have answered and vote for yourself.

i have had qestions where I wondered why one of my questions wold hve 15 good answers with some 8-9 thumbs up and maybe 1-2 thumbs down and then 4 crummy answers and then a few funny ones. Then my questin went into the "in boting", I figured I would let a bunch of people pick one, no it's normally one.

Here's the deal when in the "in voting" you don't have your picture and ID, each question is numbered, but If you can rememeber what you wrote then you can vote for your own answer, which is voter fraud.

I have made copies of different questions and then gone back and compared them and noticed that it was only a select few that knew this and that is why a liberal or crummy answer was voted the "best answer".

So you need to back on all the questions you have answered and the ones in voting you can vote for your answer. Also remember that some are extended and make take up to a week to hit "in voting".

i followed the peop;e voting and found that many of them had "best answers" up in the 30-40%. Since I did not read this in Yahoo rules, I think it is voter fraud and with that in mind spred the word and tell everybody they can vote for their own answer after it is "in voting", it's only fair and this explains
why the good answers are not picked as very few vote in this.

i have e-mailed Yahoo and told them it would be better to either put the question in voting and only have the total number of thumbs up as all answers voted on that or rerun the question like a new question and finish it in one day.

So go back and vote for yourself, once you do you may only notice one other vote and after the thing is done you can check and see who else voted. YOu will probably pick up some "best answers". I am getting the word out as far as I am concerned it is voter fraud.

This goes along w3ith the voter fraud that these folks getting these IDs. I wish the media would follow them around with cameras and show it. It was funny when Missouri closed dowm polls and they had a fit.

You have to remember that Bill uped legal immigration to 2.5 million and now Bush has dropped it to 1 million. So that's 20 million that they figured that would get, imagine their surprise and why not.


Take care. and vote for yourself!

Answer 3

let's get the facts straight. The DL proposal has in it that the DL issued would indicate the status of the person which would mean that they could not be able to use it as i.d. for voting. A US citizens DL would look DIFFERENT from the "illegal" one. If you don't know the meaning of the word, look it up. It is just a proposal contingent ( i.e. dependent) on the implementation of certain technologies
I cannot stand ignorance especially from people talking out their behinds.
Edtied to add:
no I am not that gullible. I at least understand the english language and its nuances enough to realize that if the technology is not in place, the proposal won't fly.
I am just not that stupid enough not to read, research and asininely believe that everything that is said by Faux news and their ilk and then make the broad brush ASSumption that its the Dems trying to steal an election. I witnessed the theft in 2000 and 2004, when I personally witnessed the Diebold machines in FL flip votes from Dem to Republican, so don't talk to me about , "oooh its just the Dems trying to steal an election by giving illegals votes"
Hell if they do, at least they want to participate in the electoral process unlike so many born in this nation who sit on their a*s, bit*h and complain about the state of affairs yet they did not get up and vote when they were eligible to do so or they try to and then find out that their rights have been taken away from them by the government with no proof at all and no way for them to dispute it. I am so disgusted with you people considering out of the entire NATION, from 2002-2005, the Bush administration was only able to find 24 people who commited voter fraud. 24 PEOPLE and it was not for lack of trying. Oh that did not include Ann Coulter who lied and put her realtor's address on the card so she could vote in Palm Beach county, FL - she lives in NY. Nothing was done to her.
However the orchestrated "purge" of eligible voters in FL and OH. by labelling them criminals when AFTER the vote, it was determined that 98% of those purged in Fl and 96% in OH had NO criminal record at all. Don't tell me that these people were treated fairly when the letters informing them of their right to challenge the purge is sent to them AFTER the deadline for rebuttal or it was sent to their old address even though their "new" voter card has them in the district they were eligible to vote in. This was done in OH in 2004 & 2006. The orchestrated disenfranchisement of people by the head of the division who oversees voter rights ( Bush policital appointee John Tanner) whose comment was this, "voter ID restrictions may disenfranchise "elderly voters," but not minority voters because "minorities don't become elderly the way white people do. They die first." NO ONE should be disenfranchised
None of you have spoken out about that. Oh it just those damn illegals, they are the problem. Get real.

Answer 4

We had a similar problem with Gray Davis in California.

It is how Davis was reelected so handily-the illegal immigrant vote that voters discovered only after he was reelected.

We gathered support for a recall and threw Davis out on his butt. We put the Governator in, who is a bit more left than I would like, and CA is still in trouble debt-wise. But CA today is in much better shape than in 2003 and jobs and investments are returning to CA.

Democrats are so in bed with corruption, guess who was a key speaker at Kerry's DNC nomination the following year?

The answer: former Gov. Gray Davis.

Answer 5

Illegal aliens (mostly from Mexico) have been voting illegally for the Democrat party for many years. However, the Demoncrats are greedy, as they want more illegal aliens to vote. Illegal aliens know the Democrats will give them more government handouts such as free education, medical care, free housing, and they enjoy being judgement proof when apprehended for violation of our laws! All of this at the expense and burden of the U.S. citizen taxpayer.

Answer 6

They expect them to vote Democrat.

Answer 7

So they can win elections. And people wonder why I am so dead set against the abolishing of the electoral college.

Answer 8

I heard they are loosing the dead vote so they have to get illegal votes somewhere.

Answer 9

It's not just 77% of New Yorkers that are against it! It's 77% of AMERICANS that are against DL for illegals.

Answer 10

It their future voting base!