Holy crap more than twice as many votes as the second leading candidate. Notice the two with the most votes didn't vote for the Iraq war but Obama said he would bomb Iran.
http://www.whowouldtheworldelect.com/
2007-11-06 09:39:01 · 15 answers · asked by Soul Man 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I'm a Ron Paul supporter, but seriously...
When you check out each country's vote count, the U.S.A has 21,000 + votes for the good Doctor, while he has a total vote count of roughly 28K+. His love is still mostly in the U.S., followed by Canada.
2007-11-06 09:51:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Oh, well, if the rest of the world wants Ron Paul for our President, what else can we do, right? I couldn't care less if every other country in the world wants that nut case; IT'S NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS!!!!! Yeah, if I were Iran, I'd want that crazy guy in the White House, too. I'd have carte blanch then to do whatever I wanted.
2007-11-06 10:09:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think it's none of the world's business only ours and I can't believe that so many people have been fooled by another politician. Everyone knows that all politicians lie through their teeth but so many have been taken in by this liar. Go figure.
2007-11-06 10:53:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
dude ,the rest of the world would also like the USA to disarm and fail as a country.screw the rest of the world!
2007-11-06 11:20:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Voting for Ron Paul is about as effective as voting for Ralph Nader. A wasted vote.
2007-11-06 09:54:16 · answer #5 · answered by PURR GIRL TORI 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Obama wasn't in office at the time, but it doesn't matter anyways.. he has the same position as Hillary now, which is not being able to promise to withdraw troops by 2013, possibly later.
The only two presidential candidates that voted against the war to begin with are Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul.
That's an interesting website, glad to see most of them selected Paul.. I know I will be voting for him..
2007-11-06 09:46:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 7⤋
This is a 100% biased blog and has no meaning! It is not a legitimate source. The only reason another country would want us to have a specific person would be who they think they can control and would be in THEIR best interests! It would NOT be for the best interests of America.
If a country really did want Paul, that's a really good reason NOT to elect him. BTW, the world LIKES Hiltery Rotten Clintoon.
2007-11-06 09:48:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
the rest of the world is awake Americans are sleeping, God help us all if RP doesn't get the nomination.
2007-11-07 05:05:52 · answer #8 · answered by mom4peace 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of the world has never even heard of Ron Paul. And if they did, they would not be pleased on his views of trade policy.
2007-11-06 09:49:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Just another Internet scam purpotrated by Ron Paul teenyboppers. I wonder how much of that $4 million "donated" yesterday will actualy show up? My bet is about .01%
2007-11-06 09:53:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋