English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-06 09:05:59 · 9 answers · asked by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3 in Politics & Government Politics

Gus

I understand what your saying but this was a man that was fired for missing the hoop.

2007-11-06 09:16:17 · update #1

Tyler

Actually he was fired for losing Billions of dollars.

2007-11-06 09:17:46 · update #2

9 answers

I doubt cons will complain as much about such nonsense as they do about kids getting welfare. Think it doesn't come out of taxes? I'd bet there's a way it does, so we as a nation do pay for things like that.

2007-11-06 09:12:47 · answer #1 · answered by topink 6 · 1 1

I'd take it any day. If that's what the company agreed to then that's what it is. Someone who isn't involved in that specific process really can't determine what is or isn't "enough money". Kind of like liberals when they say someone makes too much money. That's not their decision but for some reason libs seem to think they should set the standards.

2007-11-06 09:11:02 · answer #2 · answered by TexMan98 2 · 1 0

Nah, I'll take Exxon CEO Lee Raymond's $400 million retirement package.

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1841989

2007-11-06 09:27:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

confident. He grew to become into not generally to blame for the enormous guess loan losses and has in basic terms been there some months, it quite is, after those losses have been already interior the works. in addition they agreed to pay him the bonus. the main suitable thank you to avert paying those bonuses is to not conform to pay them interior the 1st place. the former CEO of WaMu, who grew to become into in basic terms on the job some weeks earlier they failed, grew to become down his bonus. yet definitely, that die grew to become into already forged. It wasn't his fault and that they agreed to compensate him as a effect. So, yeah, the Merrill CEO could get the bonus.

2016-10-01 23:14:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why all the focus on the corporate bosses? What about actors? Singers? Athletes? ALL of them are way over-paid.

2007-11-06 09:10:41 · answer #5 · answered by Jadis 6 · 0 1

I don't think I should set other's salaries or deals. Whats that called, oh yeah communism.

2007-11-06 09:18:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yeah, you know, when they fire me for doing a crappy job, I'll settle for like 1/210th of that!

2007-11-06 09:09:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Meryl Lynch, can do what they want with their money, after all it is theirs,.....

2007-11-06 09:23:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i guess thats appropiate seeing that he made that company billions of dollars

2007-11-06 09:16:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers