Its a tough call for me....the Beatles are more over played, but Mick Jagger can't sing.
2007-11-06 08:30:54 · 22 answers · asked by Kingler 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music ➔ Rock and Pop
Rolling Stones. I just don't think they're that good.
2007-11-06 08:33:53 · answer #1 · answered by This Is Radio Clash 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
I love the Beatles. They're one of my favorite bands. I'm nowhere near as big a fan of the Rolling Stones as I am The Beatles. However, I feel that The Beatles are much more overrated.
2007-11-06 09:15:58 · answer #2 · answered by Muse - Viktor's Mommy 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I never liked the rolling stones..they just seemed like a worse copy of the beatles. The beatles are NOT overrated. They made some of the best songs of all time! How can anyone hate the beatles???
2007-11-10 08:19:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
It's my personal opinion, of course, but The Stones are way more overrated. I agree, Mick Jagger doesn't really do it for me. I can't get enough of The Beatles. =]
2007-11-06 08:55:04 · answer #4 · answered by Jazzy♥ 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋
I believe The Beatles are one of the greatest bands ever. I do believe The Rolling Stones are very overrated.
2007-11-06 10:57:31 · answer #5 · answered by Peepaw 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋
The Stones
2007-11-06 08:38:48 · answer #6 · answered by livn4him 2 · 7⤊ 0⤋
the Rolling Stones by far, it was all over after Brian Jones died....oh and btw. The Beatles aren't overrated at all!
2007-11-12 13:51:52 · answer #7 · answered by paperback_writer909 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
C. None of the above
Both the Stones and the Beatles have had such a huge impact on what we hear today. They've both had lesser songs, but much of what we hear today can be traced to these two bands and the British Invasion in general. (Or, take a look at the top hits in 1963.)
2007-11-06 08:38:06 · answer #8 · answered by The Oracle 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I'm not a fan of the Rolling Stones so I'm going with them.
The Beatles actually have talent that deserves to be recognized.
2007-11-07 03:24:25 · answer #9 · answered by Tesla Girl is Rokken with Dokken 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Not only are the Beatles more overrated than the Rolling Stones, they're more overrated than any band ever. Not to say they aren't good, they were a good pop group, not mesiahs or even that special besides that they had a great marketing team and did a good job convincing everyone they were something extremely new. When again, as far as I'm concerned, they were a good pop band, maybe even a great pop band.
The Stones are probably overrated as well, but not nearly to the same extent. And I like Mick Jagger's voice. "Good" singing is a euphamism for boring.
P.S. The song "Paint It, Black" alone is worth the entire Beatles catalouge as far as I'm concerned.
2007-11-06 08:42:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋
Only one of those bands is overrated, and that is the Rolling Stones.
The Beatles aren't overrated, silly. :)
2007-11-06 08:34:39 · answer #11 · answered by Chronon 3 · 6⤊ 2⤋