Republicans hate Hillary because she calls them on their sh*t. Republicans have been winning elections with slanderous Swift Boat attacks and Willie Horton lies for years. Clintons stand up to these attacks and it drives the Roves of this world crazy.
2007-11-06 16:41:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by wyldfyr 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
a million - i come across Hillary to be greater like Nancy Reagan than maximum different first women. 2 - great attempt, yeah appropriate, pull out the gender card. Her plan is rubbish. Why isn't she attempting to institute this now, mutually as she's a senator? while she's president, she'll call for the legislations so she will sign it, why no longer advise it now? 3 - She earned those titles for her habit on my own 4 - sure, it extremely is attainable that tiers of irrational hatred have brought about help for Hillary. the tiers and motives of disliking her have finished that, they seem to be slightly plenty, i come across that ninety% of the archives on her is the two untrue or distorted, this is that 10% it relatively is genuine that I worry approximately. On a private point, I dislike her for attempting to fill the area of a good lady it relatively is a pacesetter of robust women individuals. often through fact she isn't a good lady, she follows her skill toting husband around and makes use of his notoriety to learn some herself. Any self respecting lady does no longer stick via a guy that has many times cheated on her. i ought to understand if it replaced into in basic terms as quickly as, yet bill has a history of chasing women individuals, and that they don't seem to be Hillary. She additionally does not communicate for nor characterize all women individuals like she tries to, no greater desirable than Jesse Jackson speaks for all blacks.
2016-10-15 06:41:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by trapani 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't be fooled by Hillary playing the centrist. If she acted like a far left liberal, which she has actually been since she was a college student, she could never be elected. She's a chameleon, changing as the political need of the moment requires for her to move up the political ladder. She pretends to be a centrist merely to help her get elected. Once she is in the White House she will begin to move toward her natural position, which is extremely liberal. If the democrats can maintain their majority in Congress her move to the left will be even more pronounced. If she can get a second term she will then move to the far left and will do anything within her power to force her politcal philosophy on as many areas of American life as is possible. She has already vividly demonstrated on many occasions over the last 17 years that she is absolutely without character, as has been well documented by some of the most respected authors in America over the last ten years. She has never admitted to any of the questionalble actions that she was involved with when her husband was President. She will pursue a legacy as a war president, because that is the guaranteed way to create a legacy. All of our greatest presidents have had at least one war to fight, although Reagan's greatest victories came by using the threat of war. Due to her lack of character world leaders will not believe her if she merely threatens war, so she will feel compelled to actually go to war in order to "prove herself".
2007-11-06 09:05:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Sadly, very little they do in the GOP these days is rational. The party has been hijacked by the Neocons and the ultra conservatives who together have really messed things up. The average mainstream Republican is confused, angry and some are voting Democratic for the first time in their lives.
2007-11-06 08:49:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hatred is too strong a sentiment to be rational.
I don't know if the unease I feel when I think of the prospect of 28 years of alternating Bush & Clinton dynasties is entirely rational, either. But I'm not enclined to ignore it.
2007-11-06 08:35:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
She's moderate? She's as liberal as the day is long. Don't forget she is running for office and the way to to that is go middle of the road and then if she gets in office go left. Didn't you guys pay attention the first time a Clinton was in the White House?
Judging from this question, apparently not.
2007-11-06 10:35:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Nope...
And you must realize by now that the term "liberal" has a very very broad meaning for the right...
Anything to the left of Attila the Hun is "liberal."
2007-11-06 08:54:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
She's pretty liberal. I can't wait tell she goes to war with Iran and I can bi tch and moan like the hippies have been for 7 years. She will do whatever the polls tell her too, even if that means war.
2007-11-06 08:31:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
About as rational as democrat hatred of George Bush.
2007-11-06 08:31:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Barry auh2o 7
·
8⤊
4⤋
No, but it's difficult to come up with anything rational in Republican thinking.
2007-11-06 08:31:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by golfer7 5
·
4⤊
7⤋