that's pretty much right...
"1. There was an investigation. 2. The Patriots entire video library was confiscated and reviewed. 3. They studied to see if any competitive edge was acheived 4. Investigation CLOSED. 5. No further violations found during review....."
took one to two days to review that entire library? or they just looked and said "holy crap, if we let it out that they cheated in all three superbowls the league will be financially devastated."
2007-11-06 07:34:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by BulldogBlitz 6
·
3⤊
7⤋
It doesn't matter. If there is a team winning every single game someone is going to say they cheated. I hate the Patriots as much as the next person but they do have a pretty balanced team. Why compare them to a Barry Bonds homerun? Just because everyone thinks Barry Bonds is Juicing to hit homeruns means nothing. I think until they actually test him positive for steroids you shouldn't be able to say anything bad against him.
2007-11-06 07:38:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Brian T 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
84%? Where did you get that from? Not a rhetorical question, really, WHERE did you get that stat from?
And please, stop being nieve. All the teams do the same thing. If you are not a Patriots fan you are quick to jump on board without considering the actual situation.
1. There was an investigation. 2. The Patriots entire video library was confiscated and reviewed. 3. They studied to see if any competitive edge was acheived 4. Investigation CLOSED. 5. No further violations found during review.....
To me, that is an open and shut case. To you people calling them cheaters, you will never think for yourself, look at the information not hype and come up with your own conclusion.
2007-11-06 07:56:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by jskmarden 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
I'm still waiting for all these expert fans that claim "cheating" to tell me when they actually read the rule.
the answer is ..none of you have. all you claim to "know" comes from the media hype ( most of which is bull).
why do you think the Pats are still pi#&ed ? cause they really didn't violate the rule as written.
2007-11-06 10:36:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by AddM 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Don Shula said it best...."They're kinda like Barry Bonds"
You know, I wouldn't be surprised at all if the Patriots were caught again for cheating.....EEERRRR, misunderstanding the rules. I wouldn't put anything past Bill Belicheat and Tom Babymaker. If a man will cheat against his former employee, who WON'T he cheat against!
***Hey AddM,
Bill Belicheater and the Patriots were fined for what? CHEATING!! The got caught CHEATING!! There's your proof, genius!!
2007-11-06 07:39:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by tonydgr8 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
I like the thought. Patriots are over hyped. I would add to that 84%
2007-11-06 07:34:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
Good news for Barry Bonds, he's gonna have a lot of home runs this season. Cry me a river
2007-11-06 07:31:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
84%? And you know this how?
2007-11-06 07:39:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chuck 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
well said good man. we should take the green dot off of brady's helmet and replace it with an asterik
2007-11-06 07:34:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
I Got the Noooz for you Beau D.... with a question like that, you are a victim of "Pretzel Logic" .
Nobody will be there, shining your Japan, Sparkling Your China... Nobody will be there Beau D. Satva.
2007-11-06 07:32:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by gotttalovittt 5
·
3⤊
6⤋