When will people stop blaming everything on the Neo-Con Boogeyman?

Question

I know it sounds cool to use the term "Neo-Con" these days, but it's getting really absurd since most people who use the term have no idea what it means.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism

Is the same true for "Neo-Libs"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

I do not smoke pot, anymore...LOL

It should be legal though!

Answer 1

It's the effective buzz swear word. When you can not offer a solution, one often turns to calling out names. Just another rant as usually the post starts slighted and remains that way. NO debate just and argument. Popular as of late.

CON has a negative sound as in convict and so forth. Not nearly as effective as Neo Lib... there one may select Lib Turds or Dim's ? Depends on the poster.

edit: As you can clearly see rarely does it include intellectual thought patterns.

Answer 2

clarify the expenses that did bypass with Democratic help and have been signed? How as George Bush in charge for the spending with a Democratic majority in Congress that had to approve it, the two factors filibustered or threatened too (the Democrats extremely often beforehand of 2006) and the expenses to boost supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac plus save them out of the sub-best industry have been stopped by utilising the Democrats lead by utilising Frank, Pelosi and Reid. the two events tousled the financial equipment and as far as "neocons" blaming each little thing on Congress; it is probably a reaction to "Bush did all of it" out of your facet such as the passing and signing of the NAFTA treaty which replace into signed by utilising former President Clinton early in the 2nd term. the two events screwed it up so the two could take duty and end enjoying the blame game. as far via fact the republicans are consistently partisan-clarify the "great years" of former President Clinton who had a Republican majority a great style of the time or former President Reagan who operated with Democratic congress properly? maximum sessions of genuine prosperity have been while Congress is controlled by utilising one occasion and the Presidency the different for a great style of the positioned up WW2 era Republicans had the Presidency and the Democrats controlled Congress or vise versa and since the old asserting is going it takes 2 to tango. hyperlink under is Presidential vetoes- former President Bush had 10-2 over ridden or 12 (2 have been tried pocket vetoes that failed) so the two way 8 expenses vetoed so as President vetoed much less expenses effectively and tried the least style of vetoes of any cutting-side President serving extra then 2 years (Harding did fairly much less); surely stopped 8 expenses surpassed by utilising Congress and previous President Clinton thirty 5 in his 8 years; the king of veto replace into FDR with over six hundred. data are you don't be attentive to your data or did no longer do any self sustaining/non-partisan examine.

Answer 3

They will never stop whining and finger pointing because that's all they know how to do. They are for the war before they were against it but they were for it. It's pathetic how they blame absolutely everything on republicans and Bush when they seem to be the one's with power right now in the house and senate. Maybe they should think about impeaching themselves but why would they when they can vote for themselves a salary increase. They are losers!

Answer 4

The neocons are a large part of the Bush administration.
Like it or not, their agenda got us into the mess that is Iraq.
Deny it all you want.
Do you recognize any names on this list?
Elliott Abrams Gary Bauer William J. Bennett Jeb Bush

Dick Cheney Eliot A. Cohen Midge Decter Paula Dobriansky Steve Forbes

Aaron Friedberg Francis Fukuyama Frank Gaffney Fred C. Ikle

Donald Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad I. Lewis Libby Norman Podhoretz

Dan Quayle Peter W. Rodman Stephen P. Rosen Henry S. Rowen

Donald Rumsfeld Vin Weber George Weigel Paul Wolfowitz
All members of PNAC
You people should really learn more about your political party.

Answer 5

Ah...I just makes them sound like they are "in the know"....

"have their finger on the pulse of the nations problems"....

"are a force to be reckoned with because they are aware of the issues, and have an answer to everything"..

and of course cause "they are smarter than the average bear...boo...boo

.....nah....it probably is monkey see monkey do!!

Answer 6

When? When they are out of office and are stopped from doing the damage they have done to our country. And, when someone with better policies have taken their place.

You need to read your own posted sites. NeoCons ARE NeoLiberals. Geesuz christ, educate yourself before you post. Neo Liberalism is the economic system the neocons are using. It comes out of Milton Friedman and the University of Chicago school of economics which is considered very conservative. Neo-Liberalism is another term for NeoClassical Liberalism reverting back to the 18th and 19th centuries colonialist economic policies.

Answer 7

I don't think the neo con movement is dead. The Democrats are fixing to nominate their own.

Answer 8

When our head neocon and his corrupt neocon minions grow a conscience and start working for the people of this country and not for the corporate and oil interests.

Answer 9

Only when the NeoCons stop thinking they could fool every American voter and stop being the Boogetmen! They fooled us too many times by calling "Wolf! Wolf!" and like Littl' Boy Blue shouldn't believe they could get away with their tricks, over and over again!? :-)

Answer 10

We wanted to stiffen our counter-booo in response to the
much longer "libs blahblahblah hate whinewhinewhimper"
marathon-warbling from braindead parrots trained by fox,
so we can move on quicker to the issues, after the 'hello'.