2007-11-06 06:37:36 · 25 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Mel (below) LOL Are you referring to my stating the facts of what the DOD is doing to attract recruits? Please list any incorrect statement(s) I posted there. Thanks.
2007-11-06 06:44:53 · update #1
Why not. Bush and Cheney are all for war, as long as they don't have to serve.
The closest either of them got to combat is when a drunken Cheney shot his lawyer and only wounded him.
2007-11-06 06:41:52 · answer #1 · answered by buffytou 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
If they feel the need to start anther senseless war and base the entire thing on false information and boldly lie to the American public, find away to link Iran with 9-11-01 then YES I CAN SEE THE DICK AND BUSH leading the way to attack IRAN.....if that happens WW3 is not far behind and this country will be in serious trouble...You think 9-11-01 and Pearl Harbor were bad wait if Bush and the DICK attack IRAN the devstation will be far worse!!! OH and YH Vio Boy this is not the doing of CLINTON ITS THE DOINGS OF THE JACKASSES IN THE WHITE HOUSE NOW!!! I will state that Clinton had information and intel on Bin Laden but never gave the order to take him out why I dont know!!!
2007-11-06 06:50:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know, Did President Roosevelt, President Kennedy, President Johnson, President Nixon, President Clinton, The first President Bush, President Truman, President Adams, President Wilson etc. I think your question is biased, uninformed and shows a complete misunderstanding of anything historical or contemporary. By the way, please use the words "volunteer army" in a sentence.
2007-11-06 06:56:56 · answer #3 · answered by georges10 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What U.S President only used soldiers who were related to him? Iran is going to be invaded but not like Iraq.
2007-11-06 06:48:19 · answer #4 · answered by hdean45 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think an invasion would be a bad choice. Strategic bombing should be an option if needed. Its a guess, nobody on YA would know the answer to weather its a good decision or not.
2007-11-06 06:42:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Both Bush and Cheney are willing to fight to the last drop of somebody else's blood.
2007-11-06 06:56:39 · answer #6 · answered by . 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He can't if he is worrying about Pakistan. Of course, Bush has proven in the past that he really doesn't think things through.
2007-11-06 06:45:22 · answer #7 · answered by cattledog 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
War with Iran will come soon. I doubt a land invasion will occur though. That would be waaaaaaaaay too costly. I think the US will nuke them and then let Israel finish it up.
2007-11-06 06:48:07 · answer #8 · answered by thepaladin38 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
listen sh!t bucket,if anybody who willing enters the military does not understand,that the purpose of an army is to be used in a war,whether we start it or some other democrat ally(muslim) nation,group whatever starts it is in for a big surprise,what do you or any democrat/liberal care what happens to U.S. soldiers,you do not have a problem killing future U.S. soldiers in a women's womb(abortion),not to mention the treatment given to U.S. soldiers on there return from vietnam,remember the spitting,throwing crap on them,praying uncle ho`s,gooks would kill as meaning U.S. troops as possible LIBERAL IDIOTS!
2007-11-06 06:51:40 · answer #9 · answered by truckman 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They would like to, but obviously something prevents them from doing so. And I hope and pray that that thing (whatever it is) will continue preventing them from starting a new war of aggression.
2007-11-06 06:43:27 · answer #10 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋