Ron Paul is getting more and more popular, support and with all the controversies and flip flopping done by the front runners they left the door wide open for him.
Who has more integrity, Ron Paul or Hillery?
2007-11-06 06:30:26 · 18 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
His stance on the war, illegals and spending are what most Americans want changed.
2007-11-06 06:32:13 · update #1
Anything is possible !!
No doubt in my mind that Ron Paul has more integrity than Hillary.
2007-11-06 06:33:27 · answer #1 · answered by Sean 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
It could happen due mostly to the possibility of a Ron Paul nomination and the likelihood of a Hillary nomination. The antipathy borne unto the Clintons by the average Republican, regardless of candidate, could result in a large turnout to prevent a Hillary candidacy.
As a concerned American, the elections I realistically could see happening that would be most beneficial to America are a choice between Paul and Obama. Granted, I hope to high heaven Paul would win that election and my vote would go to him. But Obama is the least bad of the Dems that has a shot at winning.
2007-11-06 06:43:40 · answer #2 · answered by Bitterpill 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillery She will implode before 08> Ron Paul has issues on how he see the USA Military & world support>
2007-11-06 08:25:55 · answer #3 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
so which you're asserting Hillary is working to lose against the republicans just to come back at invoice? Preposterous! Hillary is a sort of politicians that needs to work out their occasion win gloriousely as they boot out the different facet. Her, Obama, Edwards, even Pelosi, as properly as a handful of Republicans do no longer something yet combat in those partisan stalemates. invoice helps the democrats and can probably want them to win, yet he's no longer the type who's at conflict with them. human beings like Hillary and Newt Gingrich in simple terms elect their occasion to dominate over the different. it somewhat is different from she needs to hold a rustic down via fact of a relationship or a Persian dictator threatening her father's existence. yet i might like to have invoice back in there!
2016-10-03 11:59:49 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will always be the same idiots who weigh their party affiliation more than their interest in America itself... the same folks who voted Bush in to divide America and bring down America's pride and credibility in the world. Guess the same idiots will continue to betray the American pride and stance in the world! If they haven't already learned from their mistake and are still in denial, they will never change, come voting time. Just examine all the posts and judge for yourselves those seemingly still in denial and think of sheer party affiliation raks far more inportant than lifting up America once to No. 1 again in the world!
2007-11-06 07:25:53 · answer #5 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the Democrats are doomed with a woman and an African American running. I have nothing against it, but the rest of the country might. Again I can't see the Democrats wanting the mess that Bush built...it might take another Republican to get further into trouble before this nation is so sick of Republicans that a dog catcher can win the presidency.
2007-11-06 06:41:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I heard Lou Dobbs say Ron was a liberterian, but what is the difference? At htis time if he gets support it shows that when Fred Thompson can pull 17% he is either strong or the repub voters are still thinking. You know the answer to the last one. take care.
2007-11-06 13:59:57 · answer #7 · answered by R J 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Republicans are the unpopular party now so it should be a shoe-in for the Dems. But it looks like Pelosi's Congress and the Dem candidates are trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. I think the Reps can pull it out. As long as it's not Ron Paul.
2007-11-06 06:42:03 · answer #8 · answered by Matt D 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
If Ron Paul makes it on the ballot - absolutely!
EDIT: I have to add this after reading "bearkat"s response below. Get your story straight. The same article you link to shows in remarks that all comments in question were from 1 article that wasn't even written by Ron Paul. Check your "facts"! - or at least don't link to the article so that we can all find out you don't know what you're talking about
2007-11-06 06:38:33 · answer #9 · answered by AriesJWR 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
If the nominee from the DNC is hillary then there is a 100% chance the GOP will win.
Ron Paul wins by default as hillary has zero integrity
The democrats ran for the mid term elections saying " we will end this war" and they lied about that. America will not fall for the jackass party and their lies again.
2007-11-06 06:34:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋