I mean it leave everything in move in condition just some dust to clean up. Why talk nukes when you can use Neutron bombs and you could colonize the next day.
2007-11-06 03:42:46 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.atomicarchive.com/Fusion/Fusion5.shtml
2007-11-06 04:05:21 · update #1
NOT ME
I'm Pro Neutron
2007-11-06 03:58:50 · answer #1 · answered by whirling W dervish 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Little wiki research:
"A yield of one kiloton is not much for a nuclear weapon but it is nearly two orders of magnitude (100x) bigger than the most powerful conventional bombs. The blast from a neutron bomb may be enough to level almost any civilian structures inside the lethal radiation range."
In other words, it won't work the way you describe.
2007-11-06 11:51:02 · answer #2 · answered by BNP 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's a misconception, neutron bombs still destroy the area around the explosion.
BTW, are you legitimizing any force that resists colonization? You would probably fight colonists who would not hesitate to murder people, right?
2007-11-06 11:51:11 · answer #3 · answered by ck4829 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A neutron bomb is a nuke just a lot less to clean up.
2007-11-06 11:45:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The pointer sisters talked about doin the nuetron dance
2007-11-06 11:46:36 · answer #5 · answered by IH8TomBrady 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Are you going to be the 1st one to move over there? I'll help you pack your bags!!
2007-11-06 11:50:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋