English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

If Saddam flew the planes into the buildings, he'd have died in the wreckage.

I'm grateful that GWB got rid of the ruthless dictator, and that we are fighting al Qaeda on Iraq's soil, killing our enemies who want to kill us.

2007-11-06 03:44:00 · answer #1 · answered by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 · 10 2

No I'm not "greatful". Saddam did not fly any planes into our buildings. He had nothing to do with 911. Even President Bush admits this. Maybe you have Saddam confused with Osama Bin Laden, who is reportedly still alive and has not been captured.

I wasn't sure if you were joking or if you are just very misinformed. I decided that you were probably in the misinformed group because your spelling of "greatful" shows a certain lack of education.

Furthermore, Bush did not kill Saddam. There was an Iraqi trial (not American judicial system) and an Iraqi execution of Saddam. The decision to execute Saddam was at least supposedly an Iraqi decision, not an American one.

Best wishes to you.

2007-11-06 03:50:23 · answer #2 · answered by Ron L 4 · 1 0

The dumb horse's backside took out the wrong guy True Saddam was an ****** and got what he had coming It was the job of the Iraqi people not of the U.S. government Now if Bush would have taken out Bin-laden(the person responsible for 9-11)_ he would actually have done something right

2007-11-06 04:06:04 · answer #3 · answered by bisquedog 6 · 0 0

Saddam obviously did not fly the planes, the terrorists on the planes obviously died.
Saddam did not have anything (directly) to do with 9-11.
Saddam DID however support the fanatic muslims ; he paid families of homicide bombers and he harbored terrorists in Iraq.
I am never glad when someone dies, but Saddam got what he deserved.

2007-11-06 03:47:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

A. Bush has said since day one that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. It is propagandist only who insist that the two are related.

B. I am grateful Saddam and his sons are no longer raping their country. Why aren't you?

2007-11-06 03:45:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

This is a joke right? Remember that Afghanistan's AlQueda was the responsible party. Saddam needed to be taken out regardless, because of all the horrible things he did to his own people, but we should have left and declared victory after we found him hiding in that hole in the ground.

2007-11-08 05:57:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow, I hope that was a jab at the 25%ers that think Saddam had something to do with 9-11!!!

Otherwise you are a 25%er!!!

2007-11-06 03:54:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

YES

But It would have been better if Bush had turned Saddam over to Hollywood for a OJ style trial.

Think of all the car & weird medicine adds we missed.

2007-11-06 04:20:53 · answer #8 · answered by whirling W dervish 2 · 0 1

Are you trying to be funny? If so, then kudos! Very funny.

But, of course, it is a well known fact that Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks. Even Bush and Cheney admit this. So there is nothing to be grateful about. The people who are responsible for it are generally still at large.

2007-11-06 03:45:07 · answer #9 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 3 3

More from the brainwashed and mind numb neo-cons.
Saddam had nothing to do with 911, he was not tied in with Al Queda at all. Saddam was a petty dictator and a easy mark for GW to try to make his mark in the world. The only mark GW made was to prove to the world what an idiot he really is.

2007-11-06 03:48:33 · answer #10 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers