English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2007/030907King.htm

MIT engineer Jeff King presents evidence that has led him to the conclusion that the twin towers and building seven were demolished in a controlled fashion on September 11 2001.

http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/pentagon/ImageIndexPentagon.html

2007-11-06 02:48:40 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

Go to You Tube and watch "Loose Change" a conspiracy theory like no other. RScott

2007-11-06 02:54:19 · answer #1 · answered by RScott 3 · 0 0

How comes some people think that the expression "conspiracy theory" defies the laws of physics?

The popular mechanics article is the best attempt at explaining how the towers might have fell, but even that article admits that the heat alone was not sufficient, and throws in the idea that it was the heat combined with thermal expansion. The idea that the jet fuel could have melted the inner core of the 1,000 foot skyscrapers is like a bic lighter melting a 50" rebar 3/4" thick.

Heck, alot of people still buy the magic bullet theory.

2007-11-06 03:11:57 · answer #2 · answered by poet1b 4 · 1 0

Because MIT standards have really dropped!? That or Jeff is an idiot and only claims to be a MIT engineer. Does Jeff have a degree in sturctural design and what is his background in explosive demolition?

IF Jeff watched Discovery Channel he would KNOW it takes days if not weeks to prepare a building for implosion. The structure must be weakened, holes drilled in the remaining structure, wires run, and charges set to drop a building.

And if YOU watched Discovery Channel you would know this a well.

2007-11-06 04:18:59 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0 0

This is common sense, the potential energy in the undamaged portions of the buildings were blown to kingdom come. If you take the time to look one can see the buildings being pulverized into dust. Not crushed in to peices like a jackhammer would, PULVERIZED, thus giving the speed of the demolition and the rate of the free fall. THE ONLY POSSIBLE ANSWER..

Question how did Osama's men get those explosives in the building??

2007-11-06 02:58:05 · answer #4 · answered by Waas up 5 · 1 0

Even Larry Silverstein, the owner of the WTC said himself that he gave the order to "pull" WTC 7..

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cutter.html

2007-11-06 02:51:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

for each bush-hater who needs to sense like some sort of comicbook superhero out of the X-information for "exposing the reality" there are a minimum of 10 rational people who've debunked this rubbish time and time returned.

2016-11-10 10:57:35 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

There are many theories as usual on things this big. But the bottomline is that some nut planned it out and pulled it off. The question is; which nut?

2007-11-06 02:52:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What is he supposed to be a teacher or something? If he is, then perhaps they need to add his name to the staff roster since I don't seem to find it on the list anywhere. If he is simply a student, then sorry, but he needs a few more classes.

2007-11-06 03:03:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Who cares what one Engineer says ? The History Channel and Popular Mechanics have show beyond any reasonable doubt that all the 9/11 conspiracy claims are pure and utter nonsense.

2007-11-06 02:52:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Give it a rest. Find something more constructive to waste your time on.

2007-11-06 03:15:37 · answer #10 · answered by Flyflinger 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers