English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-06 02:35:12 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Have You Seen The Flight 77 Pentagon Picture Analysis?

http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/pentagon/ImageIndexPentagon.html

2007-11-06 02:37:47 · update #1

5 answers

Any particular 9/11 picture analysis?

Why do people ask questions like this? I saw one the other day that said something like "did anyone see the video about the football player?" As if there was only one football player and we all knew where the link was.

There are a lot of 9/11 picture analyses. Some done by experts, some obvious fakes. You want to give us a clue to what you are talking about?

2007-11-06 02:38:03 · answer #1 · answered by buffytou 6 · 0 0

What a waste of effort for the maker of this website.

The single point seems to be the claim that a 757 did not hit the Pentagon, but I don't see any argument. The whole website is mostly pictures. Very weird.

A lot of time could have been saved because, as opposed to the link, there is powerful evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon. Read on:

1) Dozens, if not hundreds, of people stuck on I-395 saw the low-flying plane & their testimony is well-documented in the press. Quoted from Wikipedia, “American Airlines Flight 77”:

... Steve Riskus witnessed the plane crash into the Pentagon, as he was driving along Washington Boulevard and stopped to take photographs moments after the impact.[21] Mary Lyman, who was on I-395, saw the airplane pass over at a "steep angle toward the ground and going fast" and then saw the cloud of smoke from the Pentagon.[22] Jim Sutherland, also on I-395, witnessed the plane pass 50 feet overhead, heading in a straight line into the Pentagon.[23] Mary Ann Owens, of Gannett News Service, was stuck in traffic near the Pentagon when she saw the airplane pass 50 to 75 feet overhead and crash into the Pentagon.[24] Another witness, Daryl Donley, saw the crash as he was driving on Washington Boulevard. Among debris that was scattered as the plane crashed, he found a "scorched green oxygen tank marked 'Cabin air. Airline use'" on the road.[24] Mr. Donley also had a camera with him, and took some of the first photographs after the crash.[25] USA Today reporter Mike Walter, while driving on Washington Boulevard, also witnessed the crash.[26] He recounted to CNN, "...looked out my window. I saw this plane, the jet, American Airlines jet coming. And I thought, this doesn't add up. It's really low. And I saw it. It just went — I mean, it was like a cruise missile with wings, it went right there and slammed right into the Pentagon. Huge explosion."[13]
(This is about half the witnesses, to save space)
================
2) Clear wreckage of a plane was found & photographs were printed in all the papers. Here's a nice photo from 9/11 that clearly shows plane wreckage:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6#bigplane
(scroll down after clicking)
================
3)Yes, the hole in the Pentagon was somewhat smaller than the diameter of the plane. This is explained by Professor Mere Sozen, a “Kettelhut Distinguished Professor Civil Engineering” at Perdue University. Prof. Sozen says that it’s the energy of the plane, not its size that determines the size of the hole. The plane is not a cartoon character that punches out its outline. Moving at 531 MPH it more fluid than solid and this explains why you get the hole you got. See:
http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html

=====
4) The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

The report contains color photos from the relevant Pentagon security camera which was going at 1 frame/sec. It shows a blurry shot of the plane.

The report contains abundant references to plane debris & body parts found in the Pentagon. For example, on page 26 it says:

“The remains of most of the passengers on the aircraft were found near the end of the travel of the aircraft debris. The front landing gear (a relatively solid and heavy object) and the flight data recorder (which had been located near the rear of the aircraft) were also found nearly 300 ft into the structure. By contrast, the remains of a few individuals (the hijacking suspects), who most likely were near the front of the aircraft, were found relatively close to the aircraft’s point of impact with the building."

The remains of the passengers were DNA matched to relatives.

5) Controllers in Boston spotted & actually tracked Flight 77 as it flew from the Midwest to and into the Pentagon. They ordered the F16s over New York to fly to Washington to intercept it but they were too late. Are all these controllers insane?

6) Hundreds of rescue workers found plane debris & body parts. Many accounts of this were published in the papers.

7) If it was a missile, then where did Flight 77 & all its passengers go ?....

2007-11-06 10:41:31 · answer #2 · answered by J 5 · 1 0

Are you aware this was witnessed by hundreds of people and was also caught on security video?

If it didn't happen... where is flight 77? Do you think it's still up there somewhere, hovering above Washington for six years now?

2007-11-06 10:42:17 · answer #3 · answered by Teekno 7 · 2 0

It seems that the latent 911 spammers are really threatened by all the new blood on the Ron Paul payroll...

Is there some trophy for spammers out there that I don't know about....the Spam-ly Cup perhaps?

2007-11-06 10:43:10 · answer #4 · answered by u_bin_called 7 · 1 0

Very intresting but i wish it would actlyy tell you what your spupsed to be noticing becuase all i saw were picutres.

2007-11-06 12:08:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers