Considering that it led to freedom and an improved standard of living for millions of people, it was not a tragedy at all. I'd say the collapse of the Mets this year was a bigger tragedy.
2007-11-06 02:14:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
Several reasons.
It unleashed the imperialists of USA, Inc. to do what they want to the world.
It was the completion of the destruction of socialist democracy, a process that was started in the 1920s by the "hard" stalinists under Stalin himself, and finished by the "soft" stalinists under Gorbachev.
It will now be decades before there is a possibility of socialist democracy anywhere again, as was envisioned by Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Trotsky.
It destroyed the world's leading space program that was paving the way to humanity's future. It's now reduced to being a trucking contractor to the U.S.'s "international" space station and to serve as tour guides for millionaire adventurers.
The vital technology of viral bacteriophages, which was pioneered in Soviet health care institutes, was set back immeasureably. Currently, increasingly ineffective antibiotics are our main defense against bacterial disease.
The collapse also allows those with little understanding or background in history and Marxism to pretend that either socialism failed, or that the "Gravedigger of the Revolution," the former czarist police agent Stalin, was somehow associated with a "golden age."
Workers may be fooled into thinking socialism has failed, but they know darn well Stalin wasn't their friend. So it becomes much harder for working class activists to convince workers to act in their own interests and fight against capitalism.
2007-11-06 02:35:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dont Call Me Dude 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I do not agree with you but that might be said by someone who is anti-American. The US and the USSR were locked in a deadly cold war that nearly destroyed us both. With the collapse of USSR the US was left as the only real superpower. Some people might say that with only one superpower there is nothing to keep it in check and there is the biggest tragedy in human history. We will have to wait and see if they are right but I think they are wrong.
2007-11-06 02:31:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
They tried to maintain up with the U. S. while it got here to protection rigidity spending and their financial device ought to deal with it. Their 2 possibilities have been to objective and save up and danger financial crumple, or comprehend they could not save up and permit the U. S. to be the lone and overwhelming large capacity interior the worldwide. they chosen #a million and it deliver approximately their crumple. the element it is incorrect with their financial device is the fact that each and every thing became owned and operated by way of the government and that they had no potential to make any money. Like interior the U. S. we've private businesses which could make our protection rigidity kit and for any volume of money we spend the government gets 10% returned in taxes, the money given to them would be spent to purchase the components mandatory it is a vogue they earn greater money and boost the size of the financial device, and this additionally stimulates the financial device. The soviets misplaced money on each and every transaction by means of fact they used the money to fund the undertaking, they owned the production unit so as they had no potential to make any money with the production. the fact that they have got been additionally a communist country injury them as properly. Democratic countries did not want to purchase something from them in the event that they had a call. The Soviets merely thank you to make any money became to invade and take greater land yet they understood that doing that would start up a conflict. So the containment coverage of the U. S. choked them to death.
2016-12-15 18:25:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was no tragedy. Just the opposite. Yes, it has been rough on the people of the former Soviet Union getting used to democracy, something in their entire history they have never had, but they are making progress.
2007-11-06 02:28:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
the only thing i find tragic is the fact that bin laden was fighting in Afghanistan against the soviet invasion and if the soviet union had not collapsed, then more than likely they would not have retreated and might have eliminated bin laden and 9-11 would have not occurred
2007-11-06 03:00:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by enrique7718 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Biggest tragedy? You wanted them to stay the way they used to be?
Maybe a tragedy for Russia but not for the rest of the World.
2007-11-06 02:16:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♥ Mel 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
You could always move to China. What would be stopping you? There are plenty of jobs, you could easily find one with the average rate of less than a dollar per hour. If you are still here then you must be a communist as a fashion statement. If your heart really yearned for a Communist GOVT, then you wouldnt be here, period.
2007-11-06 02:41:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
What an utterly ridiculous claim!
To even imply that this would rank in the Top Ten shows that one has absolutely no grasp on history and no perspective on its impact.
2007-11-06 02:24:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
The terror days of the Stalin run gulags, NKVD {kgb}, threat of total nuclear war, mass killings of dissenters and ethnic groups, grinding occupation of half of Europe, ...nah...the old days are gone, aand buried, GOOD RIDDANCE !
Communist Russia lost, FREEDOM won. Deal with it !
2007-11-06 02:19:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by commanderbuck383 5
·
4⤊
1⤋