should we fire nukes at north korea?

Question

north korea is a menace to the world, we should obliterate them to bring back the peace to the world. iran too.

Answer 1

You really don't understand, do you? One bad move could send us into World War III. Which is the nuclear war. Odds are WWIII is going to be a war in which few countries will come out fine. Its simple. If North Korea nukes the U.S., China, Japan, maybe South Korea, Russia, Iran, All of Europe, even Israel will nuke N. Korea and get their butts kicked. Vice versa with the U.S nuking N.Korea.

Answer 2

I don't recall North Korea attacking other countries...
I don't recall Iran attacking other countries...
(besides border disputes)

2003 USA invaded Iraq
1994 USA invaded Haiti (multinational force)
1991 USA invaded Kuwait (with Kuwait's government permission?)
1989 USA invaded Panama (police action)
1983 USA invaded Grenada
1970 USA invaded Cambodia
1965 USA invaded the Dominican Republic
1962 USA invaded South Vietnam
1961 USA invaded Cuba

The last time Iranians invaded something was probably in the 19th century. There was no Iran and it's probably a tribal fight.
North Korea only invaded South Korea, two times I think.
I can name 9 US invasion out of the top of my head and going back only to the end of WWII. And I'm not counting UN invasions (called "interventions") with strong US support (and control).

Who should be nuked first to bring back peace to the world?

Answer 3

N. Korea does not have working nuclear bombs, nor a missile that ought to hold one some distance sufficient to be a guess to the U. S.. anyhow in the event that they did have any such ingredient, S. Korea or Japan could be their first objective - no longer the continental US. interior the period in-between we've hundreds of thousands of troops alongside the North/South border, plus a substantial naval team in basic terms offshore. If N. Korea have been to attack all and sundry, they could be signing their death warrant. After the preliminary battling on the border ended, there could be no longer something to dodge our troops from rolling in the process the desolate united states and into its one and in basic terms city of Pyongang. I doubt the great conflict might final extremely a selection days. As for China, they do no longer seem to be friends with N. Korea anymore and have not been for numerous many years. China relies upon on the U. S. for his or her financial device. Letting somebody blow up your perfect shopper isn't an exceptionally sound business company plan. In different words, if N. Korea assaults, opportunities are high China's military will beat us to the capital and extremely, that must be even worse than permitting the individuals to seize the city. We, a minimum of, might enable the government to provide up. i do no longer assume China's militia might coach any mercy.

Answer 4

An emphatic NO!. It will be a sad day for all mankind if nuclear weapons should ever fly again. Such thinking, to attack with nuclear weapons, does nothing but add to the problem. The best peace, a long lasting peace, is achieved through peaceful means. Diplomacy and dialog must be exhausted, and then tried again.

Answer 5

Peace alright! Just after Russia and China fire at us, we fire back, and the survivors who live in peace are pygmies in the African jungle along with a few islanders in the pacific. They may not live long, but they'd be the last ones to enjoy the peace. We need to destroy our enemies in smarter ways.

Answer 6

that;s one of the most stupid;s ideas i ever heard.start dropping atomic bombs.and the rest of the world will follow.in the end no body wins.there goes the world as we know it.you want one dropped on your family.come on man get real here.that;s no way to solve a problem.but if you want to wipe out the entire human race, then i say lets do it. man there always seems to be a screw ball in the group.

Answer 7

North Korea is complying with our demands (right now). If they do not, they we should move troops to the Korean border and prep them for an invasion.

Iran is a bigger threat right now. We must deal with them by any means if they do not comply with our demands.

Answer 8

Considering they just dismantled their own nuclear program and aren't that much of a world threat now, I think that would be a bad Idea

Answer 9

The "mutually assured destruction" theory works by one side not firing on another because the defender would fire back.

It has worked for 50 years.

It works now.

Answer 10

Not unless you're interested in starting World War III.