Isn't that a little childish and irrelevant?
2007-11-06 01:25:54 · 12 answers · asked by The President 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Since Mr. bush has blown it, those who support him, want to show those of us who don't, just how bad Clinton was. I guess these people can equate lying about a bj, to starting a war we can never win.
2007-11-06 01:32:43 · answer #1 · answered by katydid 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
on the grounds that's what Bush could do. each time Bush became asked why we went to conflict and he will say by means of fact Clinton did not end the interest. although the entire tale is in no way informed. extremely Bush has created a lot havoc interior the 1st 4 years of his Presidency he had no person else accountable different than Clinton. remember, he spent each and all the surplus money Clinton created till now he have been given to workplace. Clinton became so properly liked that the Republicans hated it and that they mandatory somebody to be the autumn guy for their shortcomings.
2016-12-15 18:22:24 · answer #2 · answered by behl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ANd they insist 9//11 was Bill's fault because he didn't kill OBL. Never mind the fact that W was president for 8 months before 9/11 and he had all the intel, etc. I also think that the cons are trying to use Bill as a distraction to just how bad their boy w is doing. They want to talk about how blowjobs wrecked this country, and not about a 5 year old war w started with no end in sight ( or all those repub congressman chasing little boys for sex ). The cons/repubs are all about denial, lying and deception. They simply can't accept the fact that their way is the wrong way, that their way has led us down the toilet bowl.
2007-11-06 01:33:56 · answer #3 · answered by commonsense 5 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Which policy would that be?
BTW, given the quality of your questions, I find it rather ballsy that you'd take the President or most anyone to task with respect to intelligence and education. Just making a point. Something you might want to consider.
2007-11-06 01:37:35 · answer #4 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably due to the fact that the Clinton's are the consolidated power of the left.
(not a lot of independent thought over there.)
2007-11-06 01:38:00 · answer #5 · answered by Kubla Con 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A little childish, and irrelevant, it's completely childish, and totally irrelevant.
2007-11-06 01:34:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I could care less about him. However,I'm not voting for Hillary.
2007-11-06 01:31:24 · answer #7 · answered by Nikki 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
What policy are you referring to?
2007-11-06 01:32:41 · answer #8 · answered by booman17 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I don't bring up Bill,I bring up Hillary now. She's running isn't she. And she's riding Bill's coat tails.
2007-11-06 01:29:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Because this is what their mamas taught them to do.
.
2007-11-06 01:34:02 · answer #10 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋