9/11 Revisited: Were Explosives Used?

Question

9/11 Revisited: Were Explosives Used?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU

Answer 1

The Pentagon Evidence, Is Even More Compelling, Than The WTC Collapse.

Answer 2

Nope

1) Reports of explosions being heard have been examined and proven false.

Quote: “NIST reviewed all of the interviews conducted by the FDNY of firefighters (500 interviews) and in addition conducted its own set of interviews with emergency responders and building occupants. Taken as a whole, the interviews did not support the contention that explosives played a role in the collapse of the WTC Towers.”

From Section F of http://www.911proof.com/NIST.pdf

2) Some say that puffs of air escaping from the collapsing towers were from explosions.

However:

Puffs of air are seen all the time in demolitions and therefore they mean nothing.

Structural Engineer Jon Magnussen says it is fairly common phenomenon in building collapses. “You could actually have a collapse starting at the top of the building, and the air could come out of the bottom, going down the elevator shafts. It finds the path of least resistance.” (Pop Mechanics, “Debunking” p.45)

3) There was no seismic evidence of explosions before the collapse

Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that were running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives preceding the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

4) Engineers have proved that the collapse resulted from the impact & the fire. Therefore, there is zero need to invoke bombs. See NIST’s explanation at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
(Click on “Impact to collapse” )
......................

Answer 3

Planes were used to destroy the WTC towers and not explosives.

Answer 4

Again with this nonsense?!? When are you conspiracy theorist going to get over this twisted bit of fiction and join us here in the real world?

Answer 5

In some peoples minds.