English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

An increasingly confrontational President Bush on Friday vetoed a bill authorizing hundreds of popular water projects even though lawmakers can count enough votes to override him.

President Bush leaves the White House Friday on his way to an event in South Carolina.

Bush brushed aside significant objections from Capitol Hill, even from Republicans, in thwarting legislation that provides money for projects like repairing hurricane damage, restoring wetlands and preventing flooding in communities across the nation.
This level of opposition virtually assured that Bush would have a veto overridden for the first time in his presidency. He has used the veto very sparingly for most of the time he has been in office, but has made more use of it recently.
"When we override this irresponsible veto, perhaps the president will finally recognize that Congress is an equal branch of government and reconsider his many other reckless veto threats," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada.
"More than two years after failing to respond to the devastation and destruction of Hurricane Katrina, he is refusing to fund important projects guided by the Army Corps of Engineers that are essential to protecting the people of the Gulf Coast region," Reid added.

2007-11-05 19:21:51 · 4 answers · asked by Nightingale 1 in Politics & Government Government

4 answers

Probably to call their bluff. He's gambling that Republicans aren't going to vote to override his veto, even if they support the project. Basically he thinks that even though they want the bill to pass, they aren't willing to go against his clear wishes in order to pass it.

Also, it may be that he just wants to register his opposition to it, even if it goes through. So that in the future, if something happens and people want to point fingers at the bill, he can say "well, I did all I could, but they forced it through anyway, it isn't my fault".

2007-11-05 19:33:49 · answer #1 · answered by The Camel 4 · 0 1

Because, the House/Senate conference committee members, added 9 billion in pork barrel spending to the bill, while it was in committee.

The house passed a 15 billion dollar Bill.
The senate passed a 14 billion dollar Bill.

Those are the projects that everyone agrees should be funded.

Not the extra 9 billion in pork barrel spending, added to the bill during conference.

Even Democrats think the bill should have been vetoed because of the additional pork added to the Bill.

2007-11-05 20:27:44 · answer #2 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1 0

President Bush exercised his veto power and hoped that Congress will not vote for overriding his decision. It is a political gamble.

2007-11-05 19:33:31 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 1

it rather is sarcasm? real ? Irony ? perplexing to believe all of us might even have this opinion. My take is : those Republicans who voted to overide hate the fascist " Amerika " that the conservative " real believers" have been coming up here. For all you Bush-bots obtainable: you're able to get out greater normally. confer with human beings.

2016-09-28 10:47:29 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers