2007-11-05 17:21:53 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Absolutely unacceptable. The evil nature of the Nazis and Hitler should never be diluted for the sake of partisan politics.
You can question her character, her ideology, even her sexuality., but to ascribe any genocidal bent to her or any other US politician is too reprehensible.
2007-11-05 17:27:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely I support it. It demonstrates that the right really have no basis for opposing her and are reduced to petty name calling.
It says a lot more about the people who call her that than it does about Hillary.
2007-11-06 01:32:23 · answer #2 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't. If history wasn't enough proof, the Bush administration has made it abundantly clear that comparisons of current politicians or policies to Hitler or the Nazis are totally uncalled for.
2007-11-06 01:27:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't feel it progresses the discussion at all. when someone falls back on name calling, they have ran out of things worth talking about, they have no ideals left to advance the conversation, and should be pushed to the side so the grown ups can keep talking
2007-11-06 01:44:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
ABSOLUTELY....her followers are just as blind as the ones were back then and this is certainly guilt by participation NOT by association
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
2007-11-06 05:50:52 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - I think that makes light of the Holocaust. I'm not her biggest fan, but I wouldn't compare her to a genodical maniac either...
2007-11-06 01:31:23 · answer #6 · answered by TNEmily 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No I dont support it.
How old would Fred Thompson have to have been to avoid being a pedophile when he married his current wife?
50?
40?
Must be pretty old.
2007-11-06 01:27:14 · answer #7 · answered by snarkysmug 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't support any form of name-calling as it is.
I mean, really, what is this? The seventh grade?
2007-11-06 01:39:14 · answer #8 · answered by Emma 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, she isn't a Nazi. I dislike her, but I am annoyed by everybody constantly comparing various political figures to Hitler, its a joke, there is no Nazi party, and there are no Nazi's in power in the U.S. Now if you called her a socialist(not a communist)... I might say if the shoe fits...
2007-11-06 01:27:48 · answer #9 · answered by scorch_22 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Stupid sh*tty ignorant Yanks will think this a neat idea
2007-11-06 10:38:25 · answer #10 · answered by georgieporgie2005uk 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋