he is says things the other candidates would never say. he makes sense but he is lacking in chrisisma. winston churchill was a powerful, moving speaker. few men ever lived could match martin luther king junior delivering a major speach. he as moving. he had the right stuff. fdr was better than anybody since him. we need a world leader judging the way things are shaping up. putin they guy in iran etc. are more powerful speaks and please understand how important that can be. that is what we choose a leader to to do. which candidate has show the right stuff to stand up and look good for us? hillary? no she is quilified for some other position. none have the right stuff. powerful leadership is needed asap. i am sure of it. reagan said, :"mr gorbachev tear down this wall!" and it really happened. he was te great communicator. he was into alzheimer's at the end. that was obviios, which prove what really counts in the very top position. ability to speak and push an idea. and someone you trust to stay on the correct moral course.
i want a great speaker. i have studied those tape and did myself. i remain very vey impressed with the speaking ability of martin luther king. whe need the right person. if not you get four more years watch the economy wind down and watch your nephew search of dishwasher jobs and millions losing their property. oh, that maters friend. people get too uneasy and they revolt. in the french revolution the rotten politician were all beheaded for their years of cheating and self enrichment. it has happened again folks. complete utter corruption rules your life. why do you put up with it?
2007-11-05 16:29:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by JIM 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Ron Paul is a libertarian jogging at the republican price ticket. The hindrance is that no longer being into the socialist mainstream isn't recognized to so much folks. And being a in charge flesh presser (I uncover it tough to put in writing this however in actual fact that he's) he is not watching for obscene media exposition and he is utilizing the crusade price range responsibly. But the change now could be that with the Internet and the involvement of fans external the social gathering constitution, Ron Paul is getting plenty of exposition. Even if he does not win (correctly, he is out at this second) he made a big difference in many who learned that there is a minimum of one flesh presser in congress inclined to take a stand for liberty and the Constitution. The motive why he is not getting such a lot of votes is that the majority folks worry liberty. I comprehend it sounds harsh however that is the way in which it's. People worry the accountability that liberty implies, the truly liberty. You would possibly feel that you are unfastened underneath a socialist regime on account that you'll watch your favourite television exhibit with out censorship however that is no longer what liberty is all approximately. Liberty is the capacity to make the offerings on your lifestyles freely and pay for the penalties if any, be in charge for them. Socialism attempts to create the phantasm that you are sorted by means of a better energy (the federal government) and you are con into renouncing for your offerings, your freedoms, with the intention to get that safety. It's a style of "well mannered slavery" or "social slavery" or "secure slavery" however it is slavery however. Ron Paul is a difference within the correct course, the expand in help indicates that the majority folks fully grasp the have got to take the energy from the government and go back them to the states and to the folks (10th modification). There's plenty you (and someone) must learn approximately him, determine his internet web page and his list in congress. And do not get me incorrect, I'm no longer pronouncing he is the messiah or anything like that. There's plenty approximately him that is a ways from my excellent libertarian. But he is the first-rate option now.
2016-09-05 11:36:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dr.Ron Paul is without a doubt the only statesman we have had in 3 decades. This man would get Thomas Jefferson's vote. He has so much knowledge in foreign policy,economics and the constitution. He voting record is flawless on bills that would increase taxes. Doesnt want the government to regulate the internet like a FCC. All others are for this internet regulation. Imagine getting your news on the net from msm only.He voted against the Iraq war stating it would turn into what it has. He is fighting to keep our government to stay out of our lives. The role of our government is to protect our liberty and freedoms. They are doing just the opposite, it is indeed time, we have been given this prophet we must not waste it.
Ron Paul Revolution is We the People.He has awakened a sleeping giant and they will feel its presence. Every American patriot is not only encouraged to join the revolution but it's expected as an American protecting his liberty as clearly stated in the constitution.
2007-11-05 16:33:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by stephenmwells 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
I have joined the Revolution, he is probably the most on target with what is needed in America than any other candidate in either party. You will know that the mainstream powers in this country are against him when you don't hear any reports of the money that was raised for him today in the news.
2007-11-05 16:18:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rational Humanist 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yeah, he's got my vote, but I thought the elections were rigged? Google "Rigged Elections"
2007-11-05 16:20:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lil Blousou 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
he has had it from the first day i learned about him , many months ago
2007-11-05 18:00:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If he makes it out of the primaries I would, but that wont happen... He's the republican Edwards.
2007-11-05 16:18:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by scorch_22 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
But of course...see my avitar? :)
2007-11-05 16:16:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
No he most certainly is not.
What is it you like about him?
2007-11-05 16:34:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
1⤊
4⤋