If so, what does Ron Paul's 4.3 million dollar day mean to you?
2007-11-05 15:58:15 · 9 answers · asked by Lars 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
In Ron's case, he needs the money to spread his word since the MSM is not giving him the attention that they do their "chosen" ones.
2007-11-05 16:01:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, Worked for every Modern day President since 1960.
His is a drop in the bucket to Hillary and Obama's Millions which are ten times that of Mr. Paul's. Is he related to the Fish Mogul Mrs. Paul's Fish products found in frozen foods in every grocery and warehouse club across the country?
2007-11-05 16:26:44 · answer #2 · answered by Tigger 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it doesn't always , there has been examples of where voters were turned off by how much money was spent on a campaign but it helps allot
and I'm very happy about what Ron's supporters have done
bobrekrabold: Kerry did raise 5.7 but it was from corporate donors , this was from regular citizen's , it shows that there is more support , than what the TV pundits give him credit for.
2007-11-05 17:54:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the respond could be no from an idealist point of view, yet you're appropriate, impoverished persons not often attain the optimum political workplaces. despite the fact that, with a good dedication to plans and ideology, a staggering preparation (despite the fact that if thoroughly self-taught) and an extremely charismatic character, somebody ought to locate supporters to slowly benefit political floor. the attempt could be sluggish and finally marketing campaign contributions could be needed for the bigger elections, yet somebody very devoted and proficient ought to o.k. effective factors supporters with good innovations and an the two good presentation of those innovations.
2016-10-15 04:57:52 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Same as it did the last time this question was posted....30 seconds ago.
It means 4.3 million dollars got thrown away.
2007-11-05 16:03:30 · answer #5 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Kerry raised more money than Bush during the 2004 election year. We all know how that one turned out haha!
2007-11-05 16:02:48 · answer #6 · answered by bobrekrabold 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yep.... it means he is still well short of the leaders in total money raised. He is a fringe candidate, but a fringe candidate that is doing well. I wish him luck, I'd vote for him if he won the Nomination.
2007-11-05 17:20:57 · answer #7 · answered by scorch_22 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask the Kennedys.
2007-11-05 16:00:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not bills, just lip service.
Wait, let me clarify that; this was not an offer.
It is lipservice that counts in politics; not bills.
2007-11-05 16:06:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋