Citation of your statistics please?
Or is it one of the 89% of the statistics that are made up on the spot? :)
2007-11-05 17:53:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Barry C 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
you're making me giggle. 8 p.c. or ten thousand? even if it is so(it is uncertain) that's an infinitrsemil share of the american inhabitants. apart from the implicit fact in this expertise(presuming it to be maximum suitable) exhibits that something ninety two % or a million,15,500 at the instant are not radicals.or maybe presuming that the radicals are a skill possibility to country over 12 circumstances them at the instant are not.isn't that a larger than sufficient insurance for country? i can't help giggling that the descendents of the Westward,Ahoy spirits who ,if the understanding of geography of the era became any indication have been afraid that they could fall of the sting of the earth and right into a bottomless pit nonetheless good forward. Have they left such puny toddlers at the back of to be petrified of a few 1000's? I actual have an American identity (Islam is my private mode of worship). I actual have consistently well known the spirit of adventure of the Early Settlers. i'm particular the in reality unfastened American society will convert the few Muslims right here(to not Christianity)yet Americanism .
2016-12-15 18:04:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What to do? First off I'd look to the legitemacy of that statistic. Do you really think that is an accurate statistic? How did the questioner obtain an unbiased sample? Did the researcher have an agenda? Where and how was the sampling done? I've studied research formally and have learned that lots of supposed statistics were not done using valid methodology. I am highly suspect of the legitemacy of this figure. Do you really think a radical Islamic would tell a total stranger that they wanted to destroy the US? If they were in the US and had that goal they would be unlikely to give themselves away to a total stranger which would increase their likelihood of arrest. That's why I suspect the legitemacy of this figure.
2007-11-05 15:52:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pat D 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
USA must monitor the activities of the Radical Islamists in order to prevent another 9/11.
2007-11-05 15:08:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I seriously think if you were a realist, you'd be more concerned about pedophile "Christians," those of the Roman persuasion, molesting innocent, little boys. Then you could field a question like: How about permanent surveilance ankle braclets for pedophile priests?
Hey, it's just a suggestion. But Islamic extremists? C'mon! Have you possibly considered that it's all just a RUSE to gain U.S. taxpayer support to gain a dominating presence in the region, to rape, pillage and plunder those people and eventually force-convert them to Roman religious values, American secularism? Do you realize how much your current President and his intimate golf buddies stand to gain by such actions over there? And what about the sell-out Saudi's? Do you believe they are not benefitting? And what about all those corporations that are also involved? Hey, WAR is big business! And if it takes a RUSE to keep it going that is no matter of conscience for a WAR (Skull and Bones) President.
2007-11-05 17:31:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wasn't radical Islamics best friends with the president..??
2007-11-05 15:37:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Unfortunately the Radical left keeps opposing any action...and of course if anything happens they'll just blame Bush....of the radical left hopes something happens....maybe that's why they keep fighting any way to find these people.
2007-11-05 15:11:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I believe that there is plenty of room available for 1 way transports to hell !
If they want to support terroristic Islamonazism, remove them to Gitmo, or give them a "warmer" climate to reside in....
2007-11-05 15:21:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by commanderbuck383 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
how many time u want to ask same question ????
2007-11-05 15:31:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋