He is one of a few good republicans around.
decent repubs like him, but neo-cons/warmakers dont .
2007-11-05 13:52:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
There can be many reasons.
1 republicans are known for being sexual deviants,mostly with young children. Ron Paul isnt.
2. neo con republicans are for war. Ron paul isnt.
3.republicans have been known to lie. Ron Paul doesnt.
4, Ron paul doesnt fit in thier club. See rules 1,2 and 3.
Well isnt it fitting we discuss the most experienced person running for president.After all we as a nation have been subjected to the lesser of two evils and this year is different. We have a choice and we are not loons,kooks or crazy, we are patriots noticing our rights and dollar collapsing and choose to do something about it before these maniacs and their mingon followers take us into the third world war.
Dont listen to douchebags like bryan and the like they are looking up Gulianis skirt.
Ron Paul has made history today his supporters which the TV would have us believe he doesnt have real supporters.
Ha try like 4 million in 24 hrs ! History made!!! Yes!!!
Get with it people this is a message of freedom. Who doesnt want to be free. Free of government control, free of income tax. Free of needless wars on terror, on drugs on poverty all of which has only increased them. Time to take our country back!!! Do not ever let them tell you that you did nothing to save our liberty.
2007-11-05 22:26:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by stephenmwells 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Because they are scared that he is not "liberal" enough. The republicans have been corrupted by the likes of Romney and Guiliani, who would have been considered democrats 20 years ago. Ron Paul epitomizes conservatism, and should be the republicans' first choice for president.
Ron Paul is the best candidate we have had for a very long time. He is honest, and this, sadly, is the reason he may not win. But if the American people open their eyes and look at who he really is, he will definitely win their hearts and minds.
Ron Paul in '08 for a better America!!!
2007-11-05 21:52:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Star 3
·
5⤊
3⤋
I'm not sure that they do, but their media outlets have gone out of their way to dismiss him.
Honestly, Ron Paul is the only candidate that will give the Republicans any chance of winning the White House again after the debacle of the Bush years.
A whole lot of Democrats and Independents will support Ron Paul against Hillary Clinton.
2007-11-05 21:55:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
5⤊
3⤋
I guess some republicans passed economics 101. Of course those republicans aren't that keen on George dubya either.
2007-11-06 00:50:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by kheserthorpe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul has a seriously flawed view of what America is or should be. He appeals to young libertarian minded people who lack the wisdom to see the how incorrect or even destructive some of his policies would be.
I do not hate the man and I am glad that his appeal is capturing the imaginations of young people. Soon they will gain enough experience and realize is foolishness on key issues but at least he is getting them interested and involved in the process.
It is not at all uncommon to find a bit of hero worship and a bit of over zealousness on the part of young people. Young folk were big Ross Perot supporters, too. He was also seriously flawed but he did appeal to those who did not really understand how the Constitution works.
.
2007-11-05 22:07:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jacob W 7
·
0⤊
5⤋
Because Ron Paul represents the people... and MOST republicans only represent the party
people can describe it in whatever way they want, but when it comes down to it, it's simple.
RON PAUL IS OUR HERO... and you know it.
2007-11-05 21:49:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by AckDuScheisse!! 4
·
8⤊
4⤋
MOST Republicans...most conservatives... indeed, anyone rational... doesn't support him.
He's a whackjob!
He calls himself "Constitutional" but if you really read his quotes it becomes quickly apparent that he doesn't know anything about the Constitution.
He only votes on issues specifically allowed by the Constitution... wow... doesn't that mean he's NOT representing his constituents like he was elected to? The Constitution does not say that representatives will pick and choose what they want to vote on. They don't represent themselves.
He's also got his head so buried in the sand about the world we live in today... he wants to go back to 1776. He wants to issue Letters of Marque... OMG, why doesn't he just put on a powdered wig and scream "Down with the Queen!"?
I'm sure he really believes his own ridiculous notions, but that doesn't mean we can risk being attacked here in America to appease his bizzare fantasyland platform.
He's a Libertarian in disguise... and he's got zero chance for any nomination, so a better question is:
WHY are you people so obsessed with him that you're still talking about him?
2007-11-05 21:56:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3
·
2⤊
7⤋
He is a Eisenhower republican, not so much for big business
2007-11-05 21:59:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Easier to insult the man than ideas. The media keeps repeating that he is a kook and then lies become truths to some.
2007-11-05 21:50:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Edge Caliber 6
·
6⤊
4⤋