Iran according to the UN and the international atomic watcchdog are not produceing nuclear weapons grade uranium - According to former President CCarter the secret knowledge for how is out of the bag and has been for a while
Top nuclear scientists say Iran could not produce a bomb for several years assuming they were trying
However Iran has been dumping the US dollar and is moving twords the Euro - exactly what Sadam Hussien did - nothing to do with 9/11 nothing to do with Alqueadia they weren't even in Iraq until after - AFTER the US forces pulled in
So will the US go to war to stabilize it's falling dollar and risk world war over it ?
Just to support a massive spending habit with not enough going in and too much going out -
Will world war be risked over the US's inablilty to balance a check book ?
2007-11-05 12:43:39 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Worthless Recruit
As opposed to the Christian nut job who attacked a couple of nations for somthing his own ineligence told him could not have been responsible and the whole Bin Laden thing - We want him we don't
I am not sure who is the bigger nut Bush or the other person
2007-11-05 12:50:35 · update #1
the nuclear bomb stuff jacks up oil prices like the president of Iran said in the past should happen.
Makes Iran happy, makes Exxon whores in Washington happy.
If Iran truly wants it for power, it would kill this whole thing dead to offer them the new experimental reactors that do not create fissile material, or connect one to their reactors.
there is always a way if people want to find a solution.
Bush and the President of Iran does not.
I've seen children come to solutions faster than leaders of oil producing nations. Doesn't take intelligent people that long to solve disputes, if they really want them solved.
If Iran wanted a nuke, they could have already had them, probably already do.
2007-11-05 12:47:29 · answer #1 · answered by Boss H 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
The latest is that we are afraid that Iran may attain the "KNOWLEDGE" to create nuclear weapons. If we stop sending literature to Iran and allowing the Iranian's president to US universities that will be a good start.
The threat that the US dollar will be dumped for the Euro is more of a threat posed by China since they have been purchasing the majority of our war dept.
People are getting pretty worked up over fear. Let's not forget those weapons of mass destruction we recently went to war over!?!
2007-11-05 21:06:28 · answer #2 · answered by ClockWork 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Iran owns enough USD to worry about the effects of them selling off the dollar (China and Japan have the biggest holdings). Plus, the more they sell, the lower the price goes, and the more money they lose. Moreover, the cost of financing another long war would drive the US further into debt, thereby reducing the value of the dollar anyway. Also, there are lots of people and countries who are selling the USD right now, so targeting Iran specifically isn't going to stop that.
There's also nothing to suggest that going to war would prevent the fall of the US dollar. The war with Iraq is certainly coinciding with a falling dollar, so there's no reason to believe another war would do anything different.
2007-11-05 20:54:39 · answer #3 · answered by Joel 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How come the US says it's OK for Pakistan to have a bomb and Iran NOT? The euro is stable because they're not fiscally reckless like these "Conservative" Republicans!
2007-11-05 20:56:28 · answer #4 · answered by Fern O 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Trout,I watched a show the other night again about Iran. There is a bldg. and on the wall the entire wall they painted a picture Death to America with bombs dropping on us. Do you think they like Us?
2007-11-05 20:56:50 · answer #5 · answered by American mutt 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
While George is in charge anything's possible.He does love a fight.Maybe America needs a revolution before he bankrupts the place.
LeAnne:that's bo11ocks,have you seen the exchange rate lately against sterling, never mind euros.You overestimate its strength more like.Take off your rose tinted glasses.
2007-11-05 20:59:39 · answer #6 · answered by Misty Blue 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sounds good to me.
I'm ready!
After Iran is out of the way I think we need to invade Pakistan.
2007-11-05 20:52:05 · answer #7 · answered by Smoking Man 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I don`t understand why we don`t go after N. Korea they are in the testing phase with their WMDs and allot closer to the US . It is all about what company is going to be left at the end of usable oil and we need the oil to sustain our suburban lifestyle. The corporate royalist went after Iraq because they were going to dump the dollar.
2007-11-05 20:49:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
If you had many American dollars, you would prolly have bought them in the Clinton era and would now be desperate to dump them.
2007-11-05 20:55:19 · answer #9 · answered by Bob H 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
oh heaven's no! we shouldn't worry about iran getting nuclear capabilities...for goodness sakes!
there is nothing to fear from a man who's belief system includes the total destruction of another country... (isreal)
nothing to fear from a man who believes the death camps during WWII were vacation spots for the jews....
nothing to fear from a man who has said again and again he hates the US and wants nothing more than for us to fall.... and was in fact one of the leaders during that pesky little take over of our embassy.....
no...he isn't a loon at all...
it is all dollar driven.....cuz' he is gonna' use euro's...
btw.... saddam had hundreds of thousands of dollars...US DOLLARS..in CASH... stuck away in hidey holes for his escape.... funny, huh? that he didn't have euros??
2007-11-05 20:51:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋