If a child is raised with those virtues they should be strong in their feelings and not be worried about what others think of them.
2007-11-05 11:55:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tigger 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
think about this as it is what Robert Fulghum wrote in his book Everything I needed to know I learned in Kindergarten.
These are the things I learned:
Share everything.
Play fair.
Don't hit people.
Put things back where you found them.
Clean up your own mess.
Don't take things that aren't yours.
Say you're sorry when you hurt somebody.
Wash your hands before you eat.
Flush.
Warm cookies and cold milk are good for you.
Live a balanced life - learn some and think some and draw and paint and sing and dance and play and work every day some.
Take a nap every afternoon.
When you go out in the world, watch out for traffic, hold hands and stick together.
Be aware of wonder. Remember the little seed in the Styrofoam cup: the roots go down and the plant goes up and nobody really knows how or why, but we are all like that.
Goldfish and hamsters and white mice and even the little seed in the Styrofoam cup - they all die. So do we.
And then remember the Dick-and-Jane books and the first word you learned - the biggest word of all - LOOK.
2007-11-05 11:43:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Diane B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It has been my experience that we are. At least we are viewed as being stupid, gullible, and easy to take advantage of. I think the only reason we are taught these lesson during our youth is because it makes everyone elses life easier, because they don't have as much conflict to deal with amongst the children. The world doesn't operate on honesty, goodness, and fairness, and I brought my kids up with that knowledge. Money talks and B.S walks. ;-)
2007-11-05 11:40:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on who is doing the seeing. I determine the imprints of people based on what specifically they are doing. For example, somebody who insists in adulthood in tying the right shoe first may be more heavily imprinted than someone who decided to care for others based on the experience of doing so and consciously determining caring works better for them than apathy.
2007-11-05 11:37:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by somebody 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Xcuse me while I consult with Charles Manson.
2007-11-05 11:37:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, they are responsible. which is always a good thing.
2007-11-05 11:38:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jake 2
·
0⤊
0⤋