English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I ask this because cons are always coming up with conspiracy theories and excuses when I hit them with facts.

Apparently the census, the treasury department, whitehouse.org, and all the scientific organizations are all controlled by liberals. It's one big tin foil hat liberal conspiracy. Only Hannity and Limbaugh "tell it like it is".

2007-11-05 10:13:30 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Cons.

Give me some examples.

2007-11-05 10:23:40 · update #1

15 answers

If only they could get those liberal scientists to clone Hannity. Imagine a perfect world of Sean Hannitys. It would be like the Matrix: Revolutions.

The talking points would be endless:

"We will triumph in Iraq, we have forseen it!"

"The best part about being Hannity, there's so many Hannity"

"THIS IS MY WORLD LIBERALS!"

2007-11-05 10:23:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

As if bashing the Commander -in- Chief in war time was not bad enough. Iraq War #2 to be correct( The Persian Gulf War ring any bells? ) . Seriously, you pose no question just present another argument. When some can no longer offer solutions they present names & games. The media is no different. The shill is Fox News is owned by Rupert Murdoch a huge Clinton backer? He rakes in ratings and plenty of dough with all the controversy! Jokes on US.

Back at'ya... when is the last time you actually read a link once you determined it was ALL CON and therefore unacceptable?
Trust me we fight the same battles every day. That is a bi partisan complaint /observation across the board.

edit: BBC World I like and I go Asia Times, China Daily, Persian Journals- foreign papers.... some slighted just compare notes from each. I do watch Charles Gibson for the first 15 minutes he's good... Brian Ross is remarkable.And all the Sunday shows I can get to.
Why the Media Embraced 9-11Truths...
http://www.henrymakow.com/001728.html

2007-11-05 10:22:00 · answer #2 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 3 2

How about the Associated Press ?

OLYMPIA, Washington: A Republican state legislator resigned Wednesday amid revelations that he had sex with a man he met at a pornographic video store while in Spokane on a party retreat.

The move comes days after state Rep. Richard Curtis insisted to his local newspaper that he was not gay and that sex was not involved in what he said was an extortion attempt by a man last week.

But in police reports, Curtis alleges he was being extorted by a man he had sex with in a Spokane hotel room. The other man contends Curtis reneged on a promise to pay $1,000 (€692) for sex.

A Republican successor will be chosen by county Republican leaders, and will serve until the 2008 election.

Curtis, 48, told police he was the victim of an extortion attempt by Cody Castagna at the posh Davenport Tower hotel on Oct. 26, search warrant documents said. Castagna, 26, told police that Curtis had agreed to pay him for sex, then reneged.

Curtis is married and has children, according to his legislative Web site. Elected to the state House of Representatives in 2004, he voted in 2005 and 2006 against a bill that granted civil rights protections to gays and lesbians, and in 2007 voted against a bill that created domestic partnerships for same-sex couples. Both measures eventually passed the Democratic-controlled state Legislature and are now state law.

Curtis was among state Republican lawmakers in Spokane Oct. 24-26 for a retreat to discuss the upcoming legislative session. He went to the Hollywood Erotic Boutique early on Oct. 26 and met Castagna, who accompanied him to the hotel, police documents said.

The two arrived at the hotel around 3:30 a.m. and had sex, after which Curtis fell asleep, according to documents released Tuesday.

(Excerpt) Read more at iht.com ...

2007-11-05 11:32:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes , you have summed up their media ideology.

I often get referred to here as a liberal, I am an independent. I know that 6 large conglomerates control 90% of all print, and tevision media in America...the internet is the new place for real news, the internet is the new underground.

Fox is indeed the boldest of the corporate channels but they ALL basically serve their corporate masters and also within the halls of power with their incesstrious relationships.
What we have with the Press jumping into bed with government, is nothing more than a plutocracy.

2007-11-05 10:20:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

I always strive to go to original source material...like this:

"Lastly, looking not to any one time, but to all time, if my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking closely together all the species of the same group, must assuredly have existed; but the very process of natural selection constantly tends, as has been so often remarked, to exterminate the parent-forms and the intermediate links. Consequently evidence of their former existence could be found only amongst fossil remains which are preserved, as we shall attempt to show in a future chapter, in an extremely imperfect and intermittent record."

(Darwin,Origin, Chapter Six: Absence or Rarity of Transitional Varieties.)

ADDITION: AMAZING!!! A quote from Darwin about the fossil record...gets a Lib thumbs down...AMAZING!!!

**********************...
THE LIB THUMBS DOWN
MY BADGE OF HONOR!
**********************...

2007-11-05 10:20:10 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 4 1

I believe what you pronounced with the exception to the impression of unlawful immigrants shifting decrease back to their place of foundation. yet in many situations, you're lifeless-nuts on. this is precisely why I say W replaced into the worst POTUS ever: he divided us all. Its now a remember of "communities" and cheering for the team you maximum heavily % out with, regardless to what it does to the rustic as an entire. I won't deny that I % out with the left, yet I do attempt to maintain an open techniques and characteristic a tendency to have super discussions with "conservatives" as a effect. Its no longer the electorate that are destroying the rustic, its the politicians themselves. they save us divided through fact it makes for greater marketing campaign contributions and related funds. To them its a activity. They vote for his or her party, no longer for his or her united states, and it probable won't end till the device falls in on itself. i admire this united states. i admire the device of exams & balances that replaced into applied over 2 hundred years in the past, yet my faith interior the device is receding. i assume what i'm attempting to assert is: super question!

2016-10-15 04:01:38 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I had a liberal who used Michael Moore's movie as fact, I laughed so hard at that one and he didn't understand why.

Personally I don't trust many sources without doing a bit of research myself. It has to be more than one source, I prefer at least 3 credible sources, not sources with a major liberal spin or who hate Bush, they're usually not too reliable either.

2007-11-05 10:26:41 · answer #7 · answered by rz1971 6 · 4 3

Yes.
You little kids get really confused.

Honey, actually read conspiracy theories, they are all believed and supported by Gullible Little Democrats.

I have studied Conspiracy Theories for years.
They are fun.
I'm always amazed at how gullible and un-informed little kid Democrats are.
And very few ever get a job and grow up.
Cool!!!!!!

2007-11-05 10:23:56 · answer #8 · answered by wolf 6 · 2 3

Most major media outlets refrain from outright lies, most of the time. Spin and lies-by-ommission, of course are a different story. If you get your news from multiple sources, and aply a little common sense, you can get an idea of what's going on.

2007-11-05 10:20:48 · answer #9 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 4 2

I used C-SPAN as a cite once, and no one argued with me. That was a first as far as the cons go.

2007-11-05 10:17:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8 3

fedest.com, questions and answers