Why would we want somebody who supported the war or claimed to have been duped to lead America? If you couldn't see that we were being terribly misled into a war that took our eyes off of Osama bin Laden (the man responsible for the deaths on 9/11), then isn't that horrible judgment!?
2007-11-05 09:33:40 · 12 answers · asked by johnadams838383 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You've got a valid point.
Unfortunately, Americans have proven to be slow learners!
PS, Do you believe that, there're still some who are
supporting bush and still defending his lies and BS's!!
2007-11-05 09:41:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Robert Gibbs has to assert President Obama disagrees with President Carter's fact. otherwise he could be stirring the pot greater on racism. i'm happy President Carter pronounced it nevertheless. There are some interior the rustic who will in no way settle for a president who's black, and the difficulty is being politicized via some on the nicely suited to learn political factors with the ignorant lots. in basic terms look at a number of the protesters. they choose the rustic to fail to learn seats interior the subsequent election. Is that why people are elected to congress?
2016-10-15 03:56:20 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah we need a President (leader of our country) thats "fun"! Intelligence is overrated. Obama has repeatedly showed his lack thereof. Thats why he's going on Oprah and SNL. You don't have to be smart to go on these shows. 9/11 was 6 YEARS ago. He can't go back on invading iraq and we're about to be out of there before long anyway. Unless, God Forbid, him or hitlery get in office. If you want to choose a President watch the debates and speeches not prime time.
2007-11-05 10:03:37 · answer #3 · answered by Tiea H 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
If you are choosing a person for the highest office in this country based on ONE thing.. you are too irresponsible to vote.
2007-11-05 09:36:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
NO! it is not.his lack of experience proves he is not ready for this type of responsibility,he lacks leader ship skills and instincts and know how.he has given a few really good speeches and is a good looking intelligent man! but he is not presidential material, he should have stayed home and full filled his obligations for the political seat he already holds!!! he will not be elected that is a fact,his only chance at this time is to run as HILLARY CLINTON'S vice-presidential candidate on her ticket as president.good luck!!!
2007-11-05 09:49:02 · answer #5 · answered by dixie58 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Not if it's the ONLY time he has been right.
2007-11-05 09:48:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Isn't his appearance on Saturday Night Live enough to choose him?
2007-11-05 09:39:30 · answer #7 · answered by Ben 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Over any one of the Republican candidates? YEP!!!
2007-11-05 09:44:40 · answer #8 · answered by Pop D 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
he is the best choice hes a really fun and important guy
2007-11-05 09:39:36 · answer #9 · answered by Aisha C 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Excellent put a Muzzie supporter in the oval office and let him appease the terrorist scum...that will work.....NOT...
History has PROVEN that appeasement DOES NOT WORK
But do not let facts get in your way
2007-11-05 09:46:08 · answer #10 · answered by Try Reality 4 · 1⤊ 6⤋