Is it better to see unidentified flying objects or spirits flying around the room?
2007-11-05 08:03:36 · 18 answers · asked by Zardoz 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"As Mrs. Reagan summons the grand old gentlemen -- her eyes closed, her whispering voice beckoning them from the Other Side -- candles dim, chairs wobble and an unmistakable air of greatness wafts through the parlor. Suddenly, all is still."
2007-11-05 08:04:53 · update #1
http://archive.salon.com/people/feature/2000/07/28/seance/
2007-11-05 08:05:38 · update #2
Thank you Government Cheese.
2007-11-05 08:07:20 · update #3
I assume "grand old gentlemen" means Old Scratch
2007-11-05 08:11:16 · update #4
Nearly every pilot I know has seen a UFO. Many astronauts are on record seeing them. If you see something in the sky and you don't know what it is, what's the big deal?
If a nice old lady wants to speak to the dead and has the money to pay for it, who cares? Is it really hurting someone?
I'd probably think it was cool to see either spirits or flying things in the sky, but have seen neither.
2007-11-05 08:19:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jimmy Carter would have been one of thousands each year reporting UFOs. It doesn't mean I see an alien, it means you don't recognize the aircraft aloft.
One spring night all of Boston saw one, people were standing on street corners pointing out the light in the sky that could move at incredible rates and the sharp turns. It was on the radio and at one point it stopped traffic on a major route.
My neighbor was retired from the Navy and he said he'd never seen anything like it. Another plane, went up, to see it close up, but it couldn't keep up with the UFO. Which eventually just left the other one in the dust and went away.
It was a big story that night they said it was an experimental plane, but the next night not one more word was said about it.
I saw that UFO, along with about a million others that time, but I've never seen a ghost, or a spirit, I'll go with Nancy holding a seance. That's a little strange.
2007-11-05 08:16:00 · answer #2 · answered by justa 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jimmy Carter seeing a UFO with Nancy Reagan on it, or Nancy Reagan holding a seance and being visited by Jimmy Carter. Either sucks.
However, one was a wife, and the other was the leader of the free world. I am just not sure which was which.
2007-11-05 08:10:42 · answer #3 · answered by Songbyrd JPA ✡ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nancy Reagan and Jimmy Carter holding a seance in a UFO.
2007-11-05 08:10:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Carter wasn't useful in dealing with the financial device, yet he did no longer create the underlying issues the two. you're fact that he extra to the debt is misguided, he did decrease it particularly. Reganomics immediately inspired the financial device, yet they have been particularly short noted regulations which considerably extra to the national debt. it is likewise no longer probable trustworthy to apply Regan vs Carter through fact the only length of republican vs democrat outcomes. I propose, we ought to certainly communicate approximately Clinton vs George W Bush, or JFK vs Nixon. The 9 trillion discern via the CBO is a projection which makes some pessimistic assumptions approximately financial restoration, and it is likewise positioned out via a in many situations republican committee. So i think of it needs to worry approximately a grain of salt, in basic terms like Obama's projection - the fact is probable someplace interior the middle. the two way, 9 trillion does no longer be our optimum debt ever. perhaps in absolute words - yet it relatively is a stupid length given inflation. Our debt relative to GDP replaced into plenty bigger positioned up WW2.
2016-10-15 03:41:02 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton communing with the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt.
2007-11-05 08:16:59 · answer #6 · answered by ML 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Haven't you noticed the nutty-er the more popular? Oh, even a peanut farmer can't compete with Reagan.
2007-11-05 08:11:29 · answer #7 · answered by edubya 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe he did see something. Do you really believe the universe can be so big, with only life on ONE planet. You can't be so foolish can you.
My gosh well for Nancy, sorry girl you lost it.
2007-11-05 08:11:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nancy wasn't in charge of the US, nor responsible for keeping our citizens safe. She can believe whatever she wants. I wouldn't care what Carter believed about UFO's so long as he didn't cause the government to grow and increase taxes and cause record inflation, and cause record prime interest rates, and cause gas rationing...and so on and so on.
2007-11-05 08:07:56 · answer #9 · answered by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I don't see that there's anything wrong with either. What I see wrong is people venting their hatred over a trivial topic such as this. Shame
2007-11-05 08:27:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋