English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

well I can say is if you believe the universe had a creator a good start would ask yourself so how creator was created.

Just imagine you have exactly Nothing then Dang! an intelligent being aka Godlike with a complex mind born instanly and do everything. seems more like a bad sci-fi story don't u think.

Now imagine you have nothing again but something starts to be created and after trillions of years the first element is created, then the second and so on.
way more convincing don't you think?

even if universe had a creator It would came from a point, a start. so the question come back to the same point if u got what i mean.

2007-11-05 07:47:57 · answer #1 · answered by Dude 3 · 0 0

1. We do not know.
In Science, the result seems to be the same, whether we pose as a hypothesis that a Creator exists or that the universe has no creator. Therefore, the question is not (yet)resolvable by science.
In Religion, the postulate is that a Creator exists. Therefore, religion cannot be used to prove or disprove the existence of a creator.
A system based on a postulate cannot be used to prove or disprove the postulate. For example, plane geometry is based on postulates, one of which is that parallel lines never meet. You cannot use plane geometry to 'prove' that parallel line never meet.

2) We do not know.
Science: The best theory we have so far on how the universe evolves (the Big Bang Theory) cannot be pushed back before the 'Planck Time' a time very early in the history of our universe, but still a time that came AFTER creation. For what happened before the Planck Time, our rules and knowledge of physics cannot be applied.
Religion: The postulate of the existence of a creator implies that there was a creation (otherwise, the postulate is invalidated).

---

The Big Bang theory was formulated from a hypothesis called the 'primeval atom' proposed by a priest-astronomer. Most atheists, at the time, rejected the idea and preferred an eternal universe (e.g., Steady-State Theory). They claimed that having a beginning to the universe required a creator.

Newer versions of superstring theories (any in a family called M-theory) try to make our present universe only a part of an eternal super-universe, thereby avoiding the issue of creation.

Not to be outdone, scientists favoring the Big Bang approach can come up with ways that the universe can be born from nothing, without the need for a creator.

Bottom line, though: we do not know.

2007-11-05 15:54:50 · answer #2 · answered by Raymond 7 · 0 0

If the universe needs a creator, then does that creator need a creator? If God just always existed and did not need to be created, then can't the universe have just always existed and not need a creator too? If not, why not?

2007-11-05 16:03:28 · answer #3 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 0 0

if the universe had a creator then it stands to reason that creator must have had a creator at some point and so on into infinity or it could be that the universe is just a lucky accident or everything could all be something we could never understand eather way we will never find out

2007-11-05 15:51:34 · answer #4 · answered by Paul B 1 · 0 0

That's a question we will never be able to answer.
I'm sorry. Goodluck though, for whatever your object is. :)

2007-11-05 15:38:18 · answer #5 · answered by Ocean Harper 2 · 1 0

There is no scientific explanation that exists or ever will exist that can answer this question.

2007-11-05 15:59:05 · answer #6 · answered by ss89 2 · 0 0

Yes, whatever god you believe in

2007-11-05 15:31:55 · answer #7 · answered by swtchk 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers