English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why all the talk of waterboarding GW? Or shooting Cheney and Rumsfeld? These questions serve no useful purpose, bring nothing to the debate, and serve only as a forum for the wack-jobs to vent their spleen. Why can't the libs just get over it and move on?

2007-11-05 06:21:32 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

And when you respond to these stupid questions they delete you answer chop-chop! I think they (meaning the looney-lefties) must monitor this site constantly and as soon as they see an answer they don't like, wham! it's gone! What a joke!

2007-11-05 06:25:28 · update #1

Gramma-Arlene: Why would I report your answer? It's thoughtful and insightful. No ranting and no insults. What a refreshing change from so many others!

2007-11-05 07:07:30 · update #2

Well, Lou, I'll give you this much: your answer is cogent, simple and no insults. I disgagree with much of what you say but at least we're being civil and I thank you for that. Look at some of the other answers: rants and name calling.

2007-11-05 07:50:59 · update #3

31 answers

they are all suffering from BDS or, bush derangement syndrome. it is characterized by a tourette's syndrome - like inability to control speech and an irrational hatred of men with common sense. they are often heard screaming things like, "bush lied, kids died", or "cheney is the anti-christ", or the ever popular "halliburton!" sadly, once contracted there is no cure and the best you can do for these poor idiots, er, i mean people, is comfort them by replaying the news clippings of al gore winning a nobel peace prize for fraud...that usually cheers them up for a while.

2007-11-05 06:29:23 · answer #1 · answered by darwinman 5 · 3 7

Because no one in office right now deserves this kind of treatment better than George. It's not an obsession. People on this site would jump at the opportunity to debate anything about George, Dick and Donald, because those three are thought to have had the most influence in shaping the current events around the country and the world. And the debate goes on in both the liberals and conservative groups.

2007-11-05 14:40:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Would you want us to lie about it? You ask...we answer. I don't actually "hate" anybody, but I'm really upset about how our great country has sunk so low that nearly everyone in the world thinks we are evil aggressors and hate us. You do know that is true, don't you? Most of this country, and most of the world, thinks our invasion of Iraq was wrong, and the fact that GWB ordered it, and continues to defend the decision, is only one reason why some people do hate him. He is a rigid man who refuses to admit mistakes and that is another thing that doesn't endear him to many. I think he is heavily influenced by Cheney, if not completely controlled, and no President should allow that to happen. (I suppose this will also be 'reported' since it's controversial.)

2007-11-05 14:46:52 · answer #3 · answered by ArRo 6 · 6 0

The answers you don't like are these ones to which you should pay attention. They have the ring of truth that is against what you prefer it to be.
Most people don't like George Bush because he has snubbed his nose at the will of the people and got us into an 'ego' 'oil' war. I dont' see anyone can stand any of the double talkers in his administration and the dems are just as bad.

2007-11-05 15:21:55 · answer #4 · answered by Lou 6 · 2 0

I don't think it's just the Lib's that are hating on GW. As the President, you will always be criticized. And if you have done a "not so good" job (and I'm being nice here), then of course you will be called out.

Changes must be made and GW is not the answer to our problems.

2007-11-05 14:26:38 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Q 3 · 4 2

You don't seem to realize the disdain for GWB is felt and expressed nation wide. I hope you never have a moment's comfort with your choice for president. For the rest of his life, GWB will be looking over his shoulder just one step ahead of being tried for war crimes. And his supporters, ( in the low 30's I believe ) are just going to have to deal with how universally GWB is held in contempt. When I go abroad I often tell people I am Canadian. It will be your turn to fuss after the GOP is out of power in 2009.
Only difference is Democrats won't have to steal elections. The Republican Bulldozer is running out of gas. You may have a party, but there won't be much of a movement behind it.

2007-11-05 14:31:33 · answer #6 · answered by planksheer 7 · 5 1

I've disliked GWB for so long now, and seen him make so many stupid decisions, I'm ALMOST to the point where I feel sorry for him......like a disabled child or something.
ALMOST is the key word.
Americans are upset with GWB, not just libs, because we all care about the future of our country and Americas relations abroad.
We don't want to be viewed as dangerously cruel or stupid....and thats the image GW is portraying for us.....and he's putting our soldiers in harms way under false pretenses....how can you not be angry with him!? He has to be held accountable.

2007-11-05 14:27:15 · answer #7 · answered by fiofunk 3 · 3 3

Because a lot of people feel he could be doing a better job. Every war ever, presidents have taken the brunt of the complaining. So deal with it

2007-11-05 14:24:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 0

Because of their own refusal to take personal responsibility for anything.
People in New Orleans build their houses in the lowest part of the swamp and when the levy fails its the Pres. fault.
Same city with a life time of worrying when the big one will hit and a week of media saying hey y'all this is the big one and very few leave and those that are stranded think its the Pres that stranded them in a cess pool.
Oh my I signed an adjustable rate mortgage with a 2nd mortgage piggy backed on to the first and then I lied a little about how much I make and how much I owe so now its the Pres. fault I am loosing my home.

They got to blame somebody else or take the blame themselves.

2007-11-05 14:39:58 · answer #9 · answered by CFB 5 · 1 4

Personally didn't like him before office don't like him now and don't think I will ever like him. Never jumped on band wagon was my view from the start.

Funny part is, when he took office co-workers about 28 of them around me I said we will be at war in 6 months. That was when he took office so 30 seconds after, Bad Governor really bad president.

2007-11-05 14:26:02 · answer #10 · answered by tannum2000 3 · 4 2

Well, that is what happens when you have an open forum for people to talk and discuss things. It'll never change.

2007-11-05 14:24:20 · answer #11 · answered by ? 4 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers