English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does Science as it is perceived by Society today disprove the existence of a Higher Power/ God?
Can Science as we know it today (without comparing it to the religions or religious Higher Powers of today) actually DISPROVE the existence of a Higher Power/God?
Can Science as we know it today (without comparing it to the religions or religious Higher Powers of today) actually PROVE the existence of a Higher Power/God?
Can Science and a Higher Power/God exist simultaneously in Harmony?
Can Science exist alone without a Higher Power/God?
Did a Higher Power/God create Science and use Science to create the Universe as we know it today?
Do the Religions of the World today practice so dogmatically and rigidly, in their beliefs, that it is the religions themselves, which do Negatively Impacting the Concept of a Higher Power/God and Science co-existing?
Please present your logical opinion/belief on some or all of these above questions. Thank you!

2007-11-05 04:15:19 · 5 answers · asked by Chuck 2 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

Science is supposed deal with just the facts. Science does have theories, usually supported by facts. But a theory is not a fact. The generally accepted theory is that the universe was created at some point in time and space by big bang. Was there time and space before the big bang? and there the theory that the universe is constantly over many billions years cycling through this process, right? Many theories, no proof (not a fact)? Well with the existence of theories being part of science, could a Higher Power be part of a scientific theory?

2007-11-05 04:53:01 · update #1

I asking this question without disclosing my opinion or my belief system. I am just trying to get other peoples view, perspective, gut reaction, scientific reaction, spiritual reaction...

2007-11-05 05:11:33 · update #2

5 answers

God Created Man in his own image. Once upon a time that was considered a miracle , now it's called cloning . God was a scientist ??? hmmmm

2007-11-05 04:31:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Science is not in the business of dealing directly with the existence of any gods. Science deals with learning the facts and dealing with evidence.

Logically you do not prove the non-existence of anything, you need to prove that it exists.

Science has no evidence for any gods, so can not prove them, nor does it have any evidence to indicate that any holy book's record of miraculous events ever happened.

Science is not exclusive of a person's believes, however to be an effective scientist you must be objective about your research.

Science, until proven otherwise, exists without a higher power.

No; no evidence for any deity would indicate that science is purely man's study of the universe.

Yes, religions are the biggest negative impact to their cause.

2007-11-05 04:31:53 · answer #2 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 0 1

Where we go wrong, is by preaching doctrine written by other men, as if we cannot think for ourselves. The truth is; the spirit realm is constantly being detected by most of us, just as we detect each other and call it intuition. There are spirit guides all around us helping to guide our evolutionary path. And there are many highly sensitive individuals that can actually detect their presence, when the spirits project images, thoughts or feelings at them. I am someone that can detect that projected spiritual energy, but not at the level of the most sensitive or receptive individuals. I was taught how they communicate, by my spirit guide, and led to make miraculous discoveries in space. I have evidence to share, but have yet to find those individuals willing to listen, driven by a desire to discover such truths.

2014-08-03 20:35:07 · answer #3 · answered by Randall58 1 · 0 0

different the individuals at paintings are irreverent or atheist or agnostic. Even my husband admitted the different day that he "does not understand what to have self belief in" anymore. each thing replaced into plenty clearer while he replaced into youthful. i will't say for myself i'm as religious as I as quickly as replaced into, and that i replaced into very strongly religious and spiritual, i come across at the instant, i'm plenty greater caustic extremely than sarcastic, plenty to the element that as quickly as I understand i've got in basic terms pronounced something horribly irreverent, I seize myself and understand that for the period of yet all over lower back and yet another place, i does no longer have pronounced any such ingredient.

2016-10-15 03:04:33 · answer #4 · answered by mcclune 4 · 0 0

of course not
NO
they could if ppl would quit putting science in this section
NO cuz God made the scientists
He made gravity but also He took His time in 6 days making everything

2007-11-05 04:26:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers