English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Seems like this would create a quandry for many feminists. On one end, they want women to be free to do what they want to with their re-productive rights, yet on the other end, feminists are socialists and like the government to dictate policy to the masses. How are feminists dealing with this issue?

2007-11-05 03:34:23 · 19 answers · asked by Fletcher t 2 in Social Science Gender Studies

19 answers

Honestly? I think they would advocate other coercive public policies, like lowering the child tax deduction and raising the childcare deduction, which lowers birth rates. They should lobby to get full employment for women, just like in Communist Russia. This lowers birth rates *dramatically*. Oh, wait, they already do!

Note the Nazi-style logic of one of the women here - the state should control reproduction rights, according to her. Alarming, isn't it?

2007-11-05 03:48:01 · answer #1 · answered by Junie 6 · 0 1

This is not a population/government issue and IS a feminist issue. No government has the right to dictate what a women can or should do with her body. If her precious and sacred body wants to procreate perpetually, who is the government to decree on this right?

I didnt see anything to suggest "Women are totally responsible for families" anywhere in this question. To suggest such a non existant issue, in a totaly different serious discussion is sexist.

If feminists worry about rare cases of FGM happening in rural areas of Africa, they should have concern about the condition in China as well.

2007-11-05 04:51:39 · answer #2 · answered by ByTheWay 4 · 1 0

i would just like to comment. as a female, and because i understand female issues, i have all respect for feminists.

however, when it comes to supporting a particular cause especially in a foreign country, i just wanted to say that it's very important for an activist to think of the present context or situation of the country, and also their culture and historical background. just because what they do seems to violate one's system of beliefs, it may not necessarily be the case for the other.

governments, no matter how cruel they may appear, sometimes have to do something that can be unpopular to certain people, because they think it is the best solution for a particular problem, in the present.

so if you belong to some form of lobby (in this case the feminists), try to get yourself familiar with the issue at debate. it's never harmful to know or understand a foreign culture, history or value system a little bit more.

2007-11-05 03:51:11 · answer #3 · answered by help_wanted 2 · 1 0

Honestly, I don't think anyone in China (government) cares about the opinions of dissenting feminists, unless these feminists have some sort of political or trade influence.

I would think most feminists would just give it up and try to pressure an easier government. Unless you're a feminist living there then it's probably real frustrating for you.

2007-11-05 03:46:50 · answer #4 · answered by Moo 5 · 1 0

Setting aside your fallacious statement that "feminists are socialists and like the government to dictate policy to the masses"...

As an individual feminist, I have little to say about the internal policies of an individual country. There are organizations within China who are working against this policy; but in spite of international criticisms (not just from feminists), it continues despite allegations of abuse.

However, citizens are starting to have organized protests. As recently as last May, villagers in SW China were rioting; protests, demonstrations and circulation of petitions are happening throughout the country.

2007-11-05 03:50:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

In a feeling, i think of it extremely is a robust ingredient, regardless of if it extremely is unhappy that it had to return to that. of direction, there are some exceptions to the single newborn coverage, including twins or multiples, yet that would not unavoidably make it impressive. If some thing would have been completed earlier to ward off the overpopulation, say... loose delivery administration? condoms? intercourse ed for each man or woman? this coverage won't be in effect on the instant. If i became a girl residing in China on the instant, yet I had the approach I do right here (very kin orientated, no longer quite feminiest, yet on no account a "trophy spouse" wannabe), i'd % to pass in a foreign country to enhance my kin. On yet another observe, i've got faith that organic determination would desire to be put in to play. in common terms the solid, the quickly, and the smart proceed to exist and thrive. it can not be ethical, in keeping with se, yet think of roughly it. it would desire to probably go away society in solid palms, somewhat of under the rule of thumb of finished idiots. EDIT: and HannahR, if a girl gets pregnant for a 2nd time, possibility is she would have a central authority mandated abortion. there's a comfortable possibility that she would be able to place it up for adoption. the two way, she would be able to be sterilized.

2016-09-28 09:22:20 · answer #6 · answered by starkes 4 · 0 0

i think most humans, let alone feminists, see that the problem with the 1-child policy is actually deeply rooted in sexism itself. in china, men are more valued, so couples aborted many, many daughters in the hopes of eventually having a son. china is now dealing with the consequences of this. there are less women in china, and men are clamoring for marriage partners.

in terms of whether or not i agree with the policy: no, i do not. but, realize, the population problem in china was so severe they felt they had to do something. was it the right choice? no. did it threaten freedom of choice? of course. did it have very serious consequences? most definitely. but i don't know the solution. overpopulation is only going to get worse.

2007-11-05 03:48:43 · answer #7 · answered by Kinz 4 · 2 1

Honestly i dont think they have much of a choice in China and no one is in any position to tell them otherwise. Besides dont give too much of a fuss if your there i hear they have a mobile execution bus and no im not joking they bring the killin to you.

EDIT: Lioness do you realize how dumb an i dea that would be? The government has no right to regulate your reproduction hell they shouldent even be able to make you get a license to have a gun.

2007-11-05 03:37:52 · answer #8 · answered by SS4 Elby 5 · 3 0

There isn't much you can do when you're faced with a one-sided Communist regime that isn't aiming nukes at you. Feminists are not socialists; though we may agree with some socialist policies, we believe in a free market and competition as well.

2007-11-05 04:33:17 · answer #9 · answered by Rio Madeira 7 · 1 1

Not to mention the fact that in China many consider sons a blessing and daughters a burden so a disproportionate number of girls are being aborted. Seems this would be more "anti-woman" than restrictions on abortion...

2007-11-05 03:39:00 · answer #10 · answered by Greg R (2015 still jammin') 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers