English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

37 answers

Torture is an unreliable method for getting any information .
Go ahead anyhow in the case of George Just because he thought it was ok to do it to others . Live by the sword as they say .

2007-11-05 02:38:11 · answer #1 · answered by TroubleMaker 5 · 15 5

I know a few people I would like to waterboard on Yahoo Answers!

2007-11-05 03:12:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Almost all of you right-wingers who answered this question completely ignored the word "IF". This is a purely hypotetical question and you know it, but you want to turn it into another propaganda war. I also find it fascinating that the majority of you admit that waterboarding is torture, something your President would deny.

2007-11-05 03:51:03 · answer #3 · answered by ConcernedCitizen 7 · 3 0

He would probably say whatever he was told to say. Whether that was truth or not we would not know. Thats sort of the problem with torture. You could get someone to admit responsibility for Crucifying Christ, Nuking Japan, Conspiring with aliens, or pretty much whatever you tell them to say. Read about the inquisition. Hundreds of women admitted consorting with satan and casting spells on their neighbors after an early form of water boarding was used on them. If torture gets reliable results then guess what? Witchcraft is real and magic is a viable threat to national security.

Forget Bin Laden we need to hunt down the Charmed Ones.

2007-11-05 02:44:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 10 0

I do not advocate torture for anyone. That said, I don't believe the truth is in the him. President.Bush would NOT know the truth about ANYTHING if it bit him on his well protected butt. He is incapable of thinking and caring, that's why his buddies put him in the White House. Wind Bush up and he lies;same lies every time.Yes its gotten old, but what the hell since the money keeps rolling in!

2007-11-05 02:45:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 9 0

No, of course not - 'cuz it's just a little water on the face! That's what Cheney said about it. How could macho Jorge Bush wither under a little water on the face? Heck, he had it worse at Skull & Bones!

2007-11-05 02:52:13 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 5 0

Nope. He'd just tell you what you wanted to hear to get you to stop waterboarding him.

2007-11-05 02:54:40 · answer #7 · answered by Incognito 5 · 6 0

Some people say he knew about 9/11 and that it was expected since he had had issues with Bin before actuallu his dad and they were expecting retaliation. As for I, i dont know and would not want to draw conclusions God Bless

2007-11-05 02:37:22 · answer #8 · answered by Praiser in the storm 5 · 2 4

Since he claims that waterboarding isn't torture, then he is also asserting that it would be perfectly legal to waterboard him.

2007-11-05 02:41:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 12 1

It would never happen. GWB won't even get on a horse according to former Mexican president Vicente Fox.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/21/wbush121.xml

So he certainly wouldn't get on a waterboard.

2007-11-05 02:38:50 · answer #10 · answered by evolver 6 · 10 2

fedest.com, questions and answers