He looked kind of haggard.
2007-11-05 01:48:58 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
He lied too when he said he'd always been against abortion, when in fact the took money to lobby on behalf of a pro-choice group.
2007-11-05 01:53:23 · update #1
cvq3842...don't know if hillary has cancer but she seems a bit loco
2007-11-05 01:54:18 · update #2
El Raton ...i think the health of a potential president is a very important issue
2007-11-05 01:57:46 · update #3
were the guards at nazi prison camps just "doing their jobs" to make money even though the knew what they were doing was wrong ?
2007-11-05 02:06:02 · update #4
cvq3842 ... no worries shipmate, almost every opinion is welcome
2007-11-05 02:08:03 · update #5
Don't you find it funny that people say it is okay for Thompson to work against something that he says he is against (abortion) because he was just doing it to make money!
2007-11-05 02:00:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
"He lied too when he said he'd always been against abortion, when in fact the took money to lobby on behalf of a pro-choice group."
You can be personally against something, and work for a company that advocates for that same issue.
2007-11-05 01:56:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, he has always looked that way. He doesn't have the advantage of makeup when campaigning. He could do with a little blush, like his mentor Reagan always managed to get just before appearances.
2007-11-05 01:57:33 · answer #3 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He was on 'Meet The Press' the entire day Sunday and
claimed he was cancer free.
2007-11-05 01:57:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When hasn't he looked haggard? Let the man be. Cancer isn't cool.
2007-11-05 01:56:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Freedy needs to stick to being a TV hero and leave the real people to do their jobs.
2007-11-05 02:51:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
he has looked that way for a while now.
Regarding his stance on Abortion, if he represents a grouper, as a lobbyist, it doesn't mean that he agrees with their point of view, just that he is working for them.
2007-11-05 02:03:05 · answer #7 · answered by Mark A 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
His cancer hasn't returned... it's never left and he still has it.
2007-11-05 01:54:04 · answer #8 · answered by gilfinn 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋