A new study estimates that 1.2 million Iraqis have met violent deaths since Bush and Cheney chose to invade.
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/62728/?page=entire
Ron Paul says to just come home!
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/2007.10.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX-DIpkJRDY
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/?tag=Iraq%20War
Is Ron Paul the only Presidential candidate who wants to bring our soldiers home from Iraq?
http://www.militaryforpaul.com/
American Independence and Sovereignty
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/american-independence-and-sovereignty/
2007-11-04 23:19:48 · 18 answers · asked by Naturescent 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/
2007-11-05 00:00:52 · update #1
We were not attacked by Iraq!
2007-11-05 00:02:15 · update #2
Cost of War in Iraq
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/Cost-of-War/Cost-of-War-3.html
2007-11-05 00:03:36 · update #3
Iraqi Deaths due to U.S. Invasion
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html
http://www.unknownnews.net/casualties.html
http://iraqmortality.org/analysis/author-comments
Faces of the fallen U.S. military
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/
How do you justify these deaths? For what cause?
2007-11-05 00:57:43 · update #4
Staying the course is a poor excuse for the Bush administration and is a cover up of their own criminal wrongdoing and lies propagated from the Reagan-Bush administration.
Staying the course means that we will continue our shameful and criminal conduct mass wrongs, acts of high crimes, treason, and murders in a war which is responsible for an estimated over two million innocent Iraqi deaths (1991 to present).
Even if our war is illegal and we should not really be there, killing innocent people trying to protect their own freedoms, the Bush administration continues on with their genocide.
Worst than Hitler, since Hitler didn't know what he was doing and people in the Bush administration, smart people, bright people, many of whom are Christians, are doing such by full knowledge and should know better!
Our eventual death toll will climb into the hundreds of millions of US civilian and military deaths, if we stay and this escalates into World War III. How many Americans want to see World War III come about and a mutually assured nuclear destruction?
Max
peacenegotiator
Negotiators during the first Iraq War 1990-91
Additional:
Question3: Is Ron Paul correct in saying that the troops should just come home?
A: Yes.
Question4: Will there be an escalated violence in Iraq and the destabilization of the Middle East, if we leave?
A: Perhaps, yes. But this situation can be solved by honorable negotiated efforts, which the Bush administration has always refused! Remember what the Bush administration continually said throughout the war: "We don't negotiate with terrorist!"
Question5: Is Ron Paul the only candidate wanting and declaring that the troops be brought home?
A: Yes!
.
2007-11-04 23:58:12 · answer #1 · answered by peacenegotiator 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'd say the longer the US stays in Iraq the safer the rest of the world is cause you are too busy to invade any other independant country and kill innocent people. My guess is you will be there until the oil runs out. Maybe the rest of the world should invade the US? The world would be a safer place then. What you should really be asking is how many people have McDogfood and KFC killed?
2007-11-05 00:34:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Seems kind of stupid don't you think to lose more soldiers in Iraq than in all of the 9/11 deaths doesn't it? Let's just double our losses. Smart plan. Then lets pay out billions in destroying and rebuilding a country so that we don't have the troops to help support the Katrina disaster. And so we also can't afford, according to Bush to fund health insurance for kids if they are sick.
I was all behind Bush regarding Afghanistan, but only 16% of the country currently supports his war in Iraq according to the latest polls that I saw on political talk shows this weekend.
So that means pretty much only the deranged Bush fanatics that support him at any cost are still supporting HIS war.
Even Greenspan (Republican), Buchanan (Republican), and President Ford (Republican) said that the entire reason for the Iraq War was not security but rather about oil.
2007-11-04 23:36:46 · answer #3 · answered by devilishblueyes 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i've got self belief congress voted to invade. Has ron paul been to an Iraqi city and grew to become on sparkling water for the 1st time in over a decade, has ron paul seen the phobia in Iraqi's eyes while they communicate of insurgents? is it okay to leave and enable genocide happen? could we no longer do all that we can so as that folk could be loose? i do no longer prefer to pass decrease back over yet I volunteered to preserve this united states and to uphold the greater desirable good. thus this is the greater desirable good for individuals 0.5 way worldwide that share little or no in trouble-free with them yet neither you nor your boy there'll understand the smile it relatively is shot to me via a youthful boy when I tension feed his stay inventory antibiotics and he and his fam get a kick out of it. Do have any adventure with this conflict different than some media outlet? Is it extremely that smart to make ASSumptions in step with 2d hand awareness. Who supplies a sh!!t suitable to the Iraqi's appropriate reason if we pull out of there all the Kurds up north are toast and Iran will are available in...this is not any longer extremely notably yet hey you would be on your settee staring at CNN questioning "gee that appears like exciting" right here is an thought why do no longer we as an greater doer of high quality do the confusing appropriate and freshen up this mess extremely of the better incorrect and in basic terms turn our backs....i propose this is not any longer like it is your blood which would be spilled
2016-10-15 02:32:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thinks its time that all the troops were all pulled out of Iraq now i just see no point in them being there any longer. The i think that out former pm Tony Blair and George Bush should be done for war crimes.
2007-11-04 23:25:42 · answer #5 · answered by exile 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
We do need a timeline to evacuate but they are remaining to try to stop a civil war that will kill a lot more of them than we have, yes we went overboard and yes we have no business trying to turn other cultures into us, because look how well thats working out, but now they are more there for remedial purposes . . . Ron Paul would ruin the country, we need someone to clean it up, not make it worse.
2007-11-04 23:30:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
When the oil pipeline can flow from Iraq to Iran to Turkey
2007-11-04 23:28:59 · answer #7 · answered by Whitest_American 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I really hate the current repub president(dubya) but i think ron is a goo guy and maybe thats wht we need to clear this mess in iraq
2007-11-04 23:28:52 · answer #8 · answered by BUSH/ISRAEL =warcriminal 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Not even close..
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
PS: I would vote for Ru Paul before I would vote for Ron Paul.
2007-11-05 00:14:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
How much does the Ron Paul Campaign team pay you for posting this?
2007-11-04 23:24:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋