Do you consider the 9-11 conspiracy theorists, in part, complicit in the attacks?

Answer 1

No, they just can't analyze situations well, coupled maybe with some paranoia.

However, they are unintentionally hurting the country by diverting attention away from the true perpetrators.

A few notes are in order.

WTC7==================
It's NOT surprising that WTC7 collapsed when it wasn't hit by a plane.

NUMEROUS LARGE BUILDINGS over a wide area were hit by debris from the collapsing towers and were destroyed.

This includes: The Marriott World Trade Center , 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center, and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church (which wasn’t even in the WTC complex). The Deutsche Bank Building was also outside the WTC complex & was massively damaged, and was declared a total loss in 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_attack#Damage

According to NIST "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." See http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5#wtc7

WTC7 was only 400 feet from WTC1. Since WTC1 is over 1300 feet tall, as they pealed away, the large perimeter columns from WTC1 struck WTC7 & many other buildings with terrific force due to their high starting position. Archival photos shows perimeter columns lying on the ground up to WTC7. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

===TOWERS DID NOT LOOK LIKE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION

Demolition experts laugh at this assertion. They don’t work for gov’t.

Here’s an article from the world-renowned journal, Implosion World that destroys the “controlled demolition theory” :

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

Answer 2

YES very much so- The whole 9/11 commission and Zelikow in particular should be arrested for the propagating the outrageous , unfounded conspiracy theory known as the official account.
BTW his motives are obvious but how much are they paying you to betray your Republic? (or is it that you're just not smart enough to realize you're being complicit in betraying your Republic)?

Answer 3

LOL so now we excuse Bush for being asleep at the wheel, and blame those who are so out of the loop, they are considered "conspiracy nuts"?

No. they are not "in part complicit". They are doing ONE thing a lot of people in this country are NOT doing concerning the attacks on Sept 11, 2001, and this one thing is "ASKING QUESTIONS".

Do I think George Bush was pilotting one of the airplanes which struck on 9/11? Obviously not. Do I think he ignored intel warnings about the attacks? Yes I do.

If you accept the fact he had prior warnings about bin Laden's desire to attack the US AGAIN, and chose to ignore them, just how much responsibility does he have in the unnecessary deaths of almost 3,000 US citizens? Is this why he refused to testify Under Oath to the independent 9/11 Commission?

And are we in Iraq to further cover those mistakes and failures stemming from the Sept 11th attacks? While he has us arguing about whether Iraq was legal or justified, Osama bin Laden is STILL free, the families of the victims of 9/11 STILL have no justice and this expensive on one side, but profitable on the other side "War on Terra" grinds on and on.

At least they are asking questions, not just accepting the "official version" like so many sheep.

Answer 4

Just a bunch of contrarian kids who's only qualification is that they have a keyboard and know how to use it.

They are inadverntently complicit in lending to the division in the country and aiding in making people like Osama Bin Ladin and Saddam Hussein more sypathetic figures than their own president.

Answer 5

No, just a sign of the times. We are so immersed in media and over exposure to events, that people, narrow minded people, can become cynical about anything and everything, even, a monumental attack on America that killed thousands, and, potentially, could have taken many more lives. I suspect most of the people that support such a view are kids.

Answer 6

No, not complicit in the attacks, just paranoid.

Answer 7

No, the complicit ones are those who support the mainstream media version of those events!!!

Answer 8

lI watched the History channed last night for two hours. I think the towers fell because of controlled demolition. After all number 7 fell, besides the twin towers, and no planes flew into number 7. And no other buildings in the history of the world have fallen because of fires. How about that building that a plane flew into in South America, that burned for twenty hours, and still did not fall. No the towers fell far too quickly.

Answer 9

I dare not put in writing the full extent of what I really think of them for blaming our government for what terrorists did, because my account would likely be suspended. Suffice it to say that I have a definitively unfavorable opinion of them.

Answer 10

Yes. They are what is known as "enablers".

By denying the existence of terrorists, they are actually helping them.

FACT