An unparalleled collection of misfits the lot...Alfred E. Newman is far more qualified and trustworthy than this collection of Socialist, megalomaniac's.
2007-11-04 18:21:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
4⤋
Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and John Edwards in that order. Just give me a Democrat this time.
2007-11-04 22:18:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
What an awful choice.
Hillary is a total phony, won't give a straight answer and is awful to listen to her talk.
Obama is famous for one good speech and has done nothing else of note other than being half black.
Edwards is the worst kind of ambulance chaser, just an awful human being and part of this country's problem with insurance rates and frivolous lawsuits.
Sorry, I'm voting 3rd party. Unless Hillary is the candidate, and then I'm voting for whoever the republican candidate is.
2007-11-05 01:59:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by ninebadthings 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm no longer huge on Edwards. i might prefer to verify Obama with Bayh, Richardson, Warner or a staggering generic. extremely frankly i think of Edwards could have been greater of an asset to John Kerry and be working for a 2d term as vice chairman.
2016-10-15 02:16:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How are all you people so enthralled with Clinton? Do none of you remember the scandels she has been involved in both as the first lady and during her run to be a senator?
Ron Paul vs Hilary Clinton?
She has no policy... she is in it for herself and she will say what ever it is she thinks you want to here so you will vote for her... I've heard her change her stance on numerous things because of the way people reacted to her...
She would make a horrible president. anyone who voted for her solely because she is a female is stupid, the same for anyone who voted for Obama just because hes black..
2007-11-04 18:50:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by EL D 1
·
5⤊
1⤋
Ron Paul
2007-11-05 00:25:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul... He's a cute little old guy, and I swear you're going to fall in love with him.
The reason I say no to the three front-runners, is that, Although their intentions of fixing the problems of Bush are genuine, I don't see them getting much accomplished in our shaky future.
The reason I say that, is that the democrats came marching in after the last elections saying that 'CHANGE IS HERE' ... and it's now November, and they already have a wrap for being the most unproductive congress that the democrats have control of in THIS COUNTRIES HISTORY. They have an astounding 11% approval rating.
I am not a Republican, nor am I a Democrat. I am an AMERICAN and love the rights our forefathers gave to us for our own protection.
Ron Paul is a Constitutionalist!!
He actually has some great ideas of change, and look at his profile: (This is REALLY interesting!!!)
This group is for all “Ron Paul for President” supporters. We are here to network and organize around his 2008 Republican presidential campaign.
Congressman Ron Paul is an independent Republican from the 14th district of Texas. He was a flight surgeon in the United States Air Force and a physician by trade. As an Obstetrician, Dr. Paul has delivered over 4,000 babies. Born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Ron graduated from Gettysburg College and received his doctorate at Duke University.
Ron Paul has served in Congress for 17 years and is appropriately known as the “Taxpayers’ Best Friend” and “Dr. No”. If it is not authorized by the constitution, it is not the responsibility of the federal government. The Founding Fathers would be proud.
Ron Paul is a constitutionalist.
Ron has never voted to raise taxes.
Ron has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
Ron has never voted for the Iraq War.
Ron has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
Ron has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
Ron has never voted to raise congressional pay.
Ron has never taken a government-paid junket.
Ron voted against the Patriot Act.
Ron votes against regulating the Internet.
Ron voted against NAFTA and CAFTA.
Ron votes against the United Nations.
Ron votes against the welfare state.
Ron votes against reinstating a military draft.
Ron votes to preserve the constitution.
Ron votes to cut government spending.
Ron votes to lower healthcare costs.
Ron votes to end the war on drugs.
Ron votes to protect civil liberties.
Ron votes to secure our borders with real immigration reform.
Ron votes to eliminate tax funded abortions and to overturn Roe v Wade.
Ron votes to protect religious freedom.
2007-11-04 19:38:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by AckDuScheisse!! 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Of the three Obama is the best choice. Hillary's message is weak. She depends on an emotional plea to women and minorities. She promises social programs she can not possible ring into effect. She has "waffled" on many important issues, Iraq, and Immigration to name a few.
People do not fall into the "Bill was great, so she will be too." logic. She is depending on it. Do your own research. Read about what her closest advisers and bodyguards think of her. Then decide.
2007-11-05 00:19:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by nac7149 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hillary Clinton has the intelligence as a lawyer and experience as a Senator and former First Lady to be a good President.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-11-04 23:51:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I prefer Dennis Kucinich. He is the only true anti-war candidate in the field.
2007-11-05 01:35:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm - for - the - one - who - can - WIN.
Earlier in the year; When Obama was polling the best against Repubs, I was for him. Now that Hillary is polling the best against Repubs, I'm for her.
ABAR - Anybody but another Republican. Why? Because we absolutely have to; Must, must, must, MUST - Get out of Iraq ASAP. None of the likely Republican nominees will do that.
2007-11-05 01:11:51
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
2⤋