FRANKLY speaking I dont think congress is ready for a woman nor a african-american man..I would love for it to be those two left to see that this world seems to be coming together but how could I believe this if there is racism and inequality and I know that the world can't be perfect, I just believe that this world has alot of accepting to do...its like nothing never changes but just the faces
2007-11-04 17:41:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Hottie 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Either way history will be made in this election because there's a woman, an African American, a Hispanic, and a few others.....so Come election time lets find out.....what America thinks.
2007-11-04 18:00:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Loksta 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Iowa replaced right into a small state caucus. NH is a small state common - that, via the way, hasn't even taken place yet. the printed/print media sound bites & headlines, mixed w/ biased polls via each style of people who prefer to control the vote via "perceived" momentum are seeming to "verify" nominations and a countrywide election that are months away. it extremely is my trustworthy desire that folk in our united states won't get lazy. they are going to look for remarks from factors interior the states of those congress people & previous governors. they are going to pay attention to the speeches and debates in entire & on their very own to verify the techniques - no longer have self belief in the media & others to tell you/distort what certainly handed off. Insist on greater desirable than interest-communicate on what the applicants have self belief, yet on what they even have finished and what they particularly plan to do i do no longer think of that it extremely is over for Clinton, or for the different candidate. it extremely is in basic terms too quickly to verify this - a minimum of for any literate and questioning society.
2016-10-15 02:13:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
At this point it's hard to say, but more than likely it's not going to be Clinton, since she's shot herself in the foot several times, and then proceeded to poke the bullet hole
I'm going for Giuliani, he'll be good on defence, and after how he cleaned up New York City, he'll be pretty good. Not to mention, he could win New York
2007-11-04 17:44:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by KreigerUSA 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
I remain undecided, but I like McCain and I like the idea of a Guiliani/Romney ticket.
On the democrat side, I would feel at least comfortable with Biden, but I don't think he has much of a chance.
2007-11-04 18:01:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by wider scope 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I like Fred Thompson. Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee being my second choice.
2007-11-04 17:46:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Adolf Schmichael 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think Hillary Clinton is going to win.
Personally, I think we need to get away from the Bush/Clinton name for a bit.
We've had a Bush or a Clinton in the White House for the last 20 plus years! (Including Bush senior as VP.)
Its time for a change. I don't think its going to happen though. (Unfortunately.)
2007-11-04 17:41:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by sleepydad 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
I don't think he has a chance unless enough people hear his message, but I really like what I am seeing in Dr. Ron Paul.
2007-11-04 17:39:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by DaveNCUSA 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
what difference does it make, changes come from revolution not democracies, in 1776 nobody voted for Washington.
2007-11-04 18:21:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mr. Spock 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't know I don't care because the people is going to be the same, in this corrupt selfish society in which we live,yes! let's watch sports and celebrate while "our soldiers" massacred the other half of the world, as long as rats as Bush are still being born, this planet is gonna suck...
2007-11-04 17:39:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by emilia d 3
·
2⤊
4⤋