You are close.
Go here:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/300407deathbedconfession.htm
Be sure and listen to the confession tape
OK, now know this: Kennedy issued executive order 11110 to reduce dependence on loans the Federal Reserve bank. He issued Silver certificates to avoid getting any more loans from the Federal reserve. Five months later he was shot to death.
Larry McDonald (a Georgia congressman) was fiercely anti Federal Reserve. He was shot down (with over 200 other passengers) by the Soviet Union in 1983. Footnote: The Rothschild banking family (England) financed the Communist revolution in 1917 AND they are major shareholders in the Federal Reserve Bank.
Louis T. McFadden was poisoned to death in 1936. He was making headway in congress to shut down the Federal Reserve Bank.
Now remember this: George Bush Sr. was once head of the CIA and when Ronald Reagan was shot in 1981 George W Bush's brother was scheduled to have dinner with Hinckley's brother the day after the assassination attempt. With 300,000,000 people in the US what are the chances of the Bush family knowing the Hinckley family on pure chance?
Research what I've told you and then you'll be ready for this:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5420753830426590918&q=aaron+cancer+jones&total=7&start=0&num=100&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
2007-11-04 19:21:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bloatedtoad 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not sure who did it, but JFK did have enemies including LBJ who was serving as Vice President.
I have a question for you. There was evidence that there were four bullets not three, but but because of critism of the validity it has been rejected.
"The Dictabelt evidence relating to the assassination of John F. Kennedy comes from a Dictabelt recording from a radio microphone stuck in the open position on a police officer's motorcycle when John F. Kennedy, 35th (1961–1963) President of the United States was assassinated in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963. "
"In December 1978, the House Select Committee on Assassinations had prepared a draft of its final report which concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald had acted alone as the assassin. However, after hearing testimony regarding the Dictabelt recording, they quickly changed their findings and concluded a second gunman had fired a fourth shot at Kennedy (it was claimed that a fourth shot could be heard on the Dictabelt). G. Robert Blakey, chief counsel of the HSCA, later said, "If the acoustics come out that we made a mistake somewhere, I think that would end it." Despite serious criticism of the scientific evidence and the HSCA's conclusions, speculation regarding the Dictabelt and the possibility of a second gunman has persisted".
After reading the whole article I can see why speculation on this has continued. Are you familiar with this evidence?
Edited to add: There may be new questions about evidence once the following happens.
"The unpublished supporting documents for the Warren Commission Report are due to be released by 2017."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination
2007-11-05 02:20:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by JudiBug 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The theories are. 1. Castro 2. The Mafia 3. LBJ. 4. The Soviet Union and 5. The one you mentioned. We will never know the truth because the documents are sealed. I know of no one that believes the magic bullet story. It's like the evidence on the Clinton impeachment has been sealed by Clinton for 50 years. The House Managers did not want to impeach for lying under oath. There were felonies committed by Clinton and Gore. Read David Shippers book. He is the Chicago Liberal Democrat that represented the House Managers and in his book he documents the crimes.
2007-11-04 23:50:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by ohbrother 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Here's my problem with the conspiracy theory: 45 years later there is not one shred of indisputable evidence to support it.
In my opinion, the circumstantial evidence points to a mob hit. Look into the connection between Santo Traficante (Tampa mob boss), Carlos Marcello (New Orleans mob boss) and Jimmy Hoffa (Teamsters boss). Their is a credible cloud of suspicion among these three characters and the Kennedy hits which is more substantial than any of the other gallery of suspects (such as the CIA).
2007-11-04 23:51:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jesus Jones 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
That sounds like a combination of two different conspiracy theories. The mafia and the CIA are each capable of killing people on their own, they don't need to combine their resources. Haven't you ever watched any TV? In any case, there's not one shred of evidence to support either theory.
Lee Harvey Oswald, a disgruntled veteran and avid Marxist who spent many years in the USSR killed Kennedy. The Soviets were our enemies.
2007-11-04 23:51:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
You may be suggesting that an abundance of evidence contributed to the hasty deposition of the Warren report.Similar abundance of evidence incidence also appears in other false flag operation statistic assembles.Hindrix,Joplin,Morrison all died at age 27 of opiate poisoning.By what reasoning is it that our leaders are negative personages?
2007-11-05 00:19:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by stratoframe 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
No the crime syndicate had no need of help
2007-11-04 23:44:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by CFB 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Don't forget to mention Fred and Barney. They took part in it too.
2007-11-04 23:44:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6
·
3⤊
3⤋