English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have read that the longer the grandparent-grandchild relationship, the more likely visitation to grandparent will be granted.

If I never let my parent know that I now have a child, will it go against me in court that the grandparent wasn't aware of the grandchild, and therefore was not responsible for trying to make contact or having a relationship?

I am completely alienated from one of my parents, we do not speak and actually I never even met or heard from him until I was 14. Do you think there is even a slight chance that he would be able to file for grandparent visitation rights?

2007-11-04 14:49:33 · 5 answers · asked by tasha 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

The gist of the ruling mentioned was grandparents who sued for visitation, regarding an already established relationship. The decision that came down was that A FIT PARENT HAS the authority to make decisions for their children, which may include keeping the child from the grandparents. In other words... unless you are UNFIT (by court standards or cps) then the court has no reason to interfere with what you decide.
You have parental rights. There are no grandparent rights. Yes, many states had passed laws that grandparents supposedly had the right to a relationship, but based on the Supreme court, those laws were not constitutional.
You are under no legal obligation to contact your parents, or inform them of a child. Should you do so?? that is entirely up to you. There ARE grandparents out there that are harmful to children.
Trust me on this.. I know of some that are willing to lie to a court, for the sole purpose of destroying a family, for no other reason than spite because they did not get what they wanted. NOT because the parents were unfit. Unfortunately, we still have to show the court that they lied in the first place.
Your parent has NO reason to file anything.

2007-11-04 22:05:13 · answer #1 · answered by wendy c 7 · 0 0

The last I heard, although some states still hear petitions for visitation under grandparent rights, the Supreme Court had said that there was no such right. The parents have the legal rights to visitation/custody.

Of course, if there is abuse, etc the courts can step in and say differently.

2007-11-04 17:33:02 · answer #2 · answered by Asked and Answered 7 · 0 0

you will desire to touch a close-by lawyer, because of the fact the small print of grandparents' rights can shift around. evidently for the period of Ohio they are able to a minimum of petition for visitation rights and the court will make sure if it extremely is contained in the newborn's hobbies. you will of direction have an possibility to have your guy or woman perspectives heard as area of the technique. i'd additionally observe that i've got not got faith they have a similar means for visitation rights if the unique kin remains intact. In different words, once you're nonetheless married to the newborn's father, they're probably out of luck no remember what.

2016-09-28 08:43:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't think grandparents have any rights to a child at all unless there is abuse of a death of a parent involved. If you don't want grandparents seeing your child, don't let them. There is no law that says you have to provide visitation.

2007-11-04 14:58:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

the whole grand parents rights thing is bogus. i went through the same thing and my sons grand mother took me t court to get visitation rights but the judge told her there is no such thing. if i chose to let her see him that's up to me nothing legally can be done to make you. the only thing they can do is try to get custody or joint custody but that is hard to do as well. you have nothing to worry about with this whole thing.

2007-11-04 15:07:22 · answer #5 · answered by king of kings 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers