And I also suspect most either have been abducted by space aliens (not the illegal Spanish speaking aliens) or they want to be abducted and have those weird experiments on them.
2007-11-04 15:23:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by CFB 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
you truly do in comparison to Ron Paul by putting his call next to a catalogue of what you for sure choose as damaging conspiracies, like he has administration over it or this is merely what he's approximately, those human beings understand something is faulty interior the government shape, it is easy to make certain for all and sundry with an open techniques, bailouts/wars/mass poverty and so on and so on so why could they vote for 2 shown liars? it form of feels that inspite of they're strange fantasies they're thinking greater logically than you're, simply by fact a minimum of they're thinking outdoors the container instead of living interior a perpetual bubble! so why do you assume those conspiracies you have indexed are untrue? do you have any evidence for this, or do you merely think of they sound slightly wacky? i've got not got self assurance 9/11 grew to become into an interior pastime yet this is merely my opinion, despite if there is not any concrete evidence to the choice so as that they are entitled to think of that simply by fact if no one has been discovered in charge and had a honest trial then all and sundry could have accomplished it consisting of the government. additionally there is not any bigger conspiracy on earth than faith, the place's the evidence for that? there is none, yet this is okay simply by fact its been around an prolonged time and all human beings accepts it different than atheists. In essence Ron Paul is the only candidate this is making an attempt to peel back the layers of society and suggesting a thank you to restructure it particularly than proceed with the comparable old sh*t tossing by crooks which contain Obama and Romney who merely shape they're regulations to thrill the firms and banking device that propped them up. I quite have a conspiracy too, which you by some potential earnings from the present corrupt device, the two that or you don't understand his regulations.
2016-10-03 09:04:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by kerby 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are some conspiracy theorists who support Ron Paul, but they are a small minority. Most Ron Paul supporters are intelligent enough to know that the government didn't blow up the twin towers and that there is no "New World Order."
The libertarians recognize that the government isn't competent enough to blow up the twin towers and that governments naturally will always try to increase their powers (and that it isn't some kind of conspiracy).
However, the other candidates are supported by alot of conspiracy theorists. These conspiracy theorists are the ones who think that the rich are evil parasites who constantly exploit the poor. There are others who believe that there is something called "Islamo-Fascism" and that Osama bin Laden is part of it and that the supposed "Islamo-Fascists" hate us for our freedom. Many of the people who believe in the "Islamo-Fascism" conspiracy theory also believe that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that Iran has a nuclear weapons program (both of which are verifiably false).
Then there are the conspiracy theorists who claim that Ron Paul has no support and that all his support comes from 1 spammer running a spambot. These claims are absurd, even though one of the anti-Ron Paul people actually did run a spambot recently to attempt to smear Ron Paul and his supporters by sending out spam emails that claim to support Ron Paul.
Most of the conspiracy theorists are not with the Ron Paul campaign. Most of them are posing as having "respectable" views to hide their conspiracy theories.
2007-11-04 15:08:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
You are confused with the liberals. Ron Paul supporters are generally Libertarians or Libertarian-leaning Republicans and as such are believers in isolationist foreign policy, are capitalists, are fiscally conservative, want a very limited federal government, and closer following of the Constitution. They basically want to throw the clock back a hundred or so years and that may be what gives you the sense that they are crazy. They tend to be socially liberal which puts them at odds with the socially conservative wing of the Republican Party and their isolationism puts them at odds with the moderate wing (often called neo-conservative) of the party. Their strongest intra-party support comes from the fiscal conservatives.
2007-11-04 15:20:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Caninelegion 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Most of them do seem to be particularly high strung, to put it nicely, and totally unrealistic to boot. And yes, Yawho is a great example of this.
2007-11-04 14:57:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Ron Paul is actually a smart guy with a few radical positions.
I don't agree with everything he says though.
His supporters are mostly Liberal, Anti-War Democrats, and a few Libertarian posers.
The rest are conspiracy hacks that make him look bad.
2007-11-04 14:53:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Someone put you up to this question or his opponents have hit you with a mind altering beam or the left and right wing have got together to plant this idea or maybe UFOs have visited you. Go Ron!( Who the heck is he??)
2007-11-04 14:47:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by .skjceuafrepiuahfpoefhpieuaf 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
Crazy with a capital K
2007-11-04 14:50:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Yes I've noticed this too. Every time I listen to him or his supporters I can't help but think something is just not right.
2007-11-04 14:59:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
Yeah - sparkling eyes and everything is THE TRUTH. roflol
2007-11-04 14:47:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Todo 2
·
2⤊
0⤋