English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

honestly, they did it once they dont need to keep the same guys around from the attitude era no offense to any shawn michaels fans/undertaker fans...they are capable of finding guys with NEW gimmicks and TALENT steroids are not making these guys more talented.

2007-11-04 13:57:10 · 9 answers · asked by Mitch M 1 in Sports Wrestling

9 answers

Well the biggest problem with the wwe is they have writers that should NOT be writers. They either need new writers or they need to give more control to some of the wrestlers like they used to do. Now the writers pretty much tell wrestlers what to say word for word so there isn't much chance for someone to stand out.

2007-11-04 14:11:02 · answer #1 · answered by komets.geo 7 · 1 0

Over the past several years WWE has gone through a major loss of main event talents. Some of which weren't fully "made" by WWE.

Stone Cold...given away by WCW

Y2J...given away by WCW

The Rock.....WWE made him into Rocky Mavia, and he turned himself into The Rock.

Just look at all the main eventers they lost because they only have four world champions left from the Attitude era. (HHH, HBK, Undertaker, Kane)

Lost.....The Rock, Stone Cold, Angle, Eddie, Brock, Y2J (coming back soon), Goldberg, Benoit, JBL, Cena (out until next year), RVD and Booker T. Christian could have been a main eventer, but WWE wouldn't let him be. Tazz was kept down after he beat Kurt Angle in his debut match , and then got injured after that. He could be a main eventer now.

Of the new main eventers only two of them are big (Lashley and Batista)...

Edge and Orton have charisma, but after that you have to look to mid card talent.

Mr. Kennedy, MVP, Morrison, Carlito, Benjamin, Jeff Hardy... (left for TNA)

There really isn't that many main eventer in America left. The main eventers in TNA are Sting, Angle, Christian Cage, Samoe Joe, and Abyss, and AJ. Styles.......At this point the only guys worth bringing to WWE would be Sting and Styles. Styles is small, so Vince probably wouldn't push him.

ROH does have some good wrestlers, but I can't really speak much on them since I don't get to watch ROH (Ring of Honor).

Basically main eventers with loads of charisma don't exactly grow on trees. Once you lose one they are not easy to replace. Plus this is just the main eventers you also have to add in the mid carders that made the Attitude era great........

2007-11-04 15:19:53 · answer #2 · answered by mack28 4 · 0 0

I think it is because they dont book them right.Kind of like TNA has been doing lately.I mean Black Machismo won clean over Angle and then lost the next night.WTF???And AJ Styles has the charisma in the ring that i would compare to the Rock's,yet he has been stuck in the midcard ever since guys from the WWE have been coming over.I mean it is kind of like TNA saying that there top guy from 2004 to 2006 doesn't deserve to be in the ring with WWE's finest.

2007-11-04 14:22:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They have the potential but the problem is they are marketing them now on 1 show (raw or smackdown or ECW) not 2 shows (Raw and Smackdown) maybe its not the attitude era because the have no real concerning compitition because lets face it TNA is no WCW but the ROCK and STEVE AUSTIN were made at the peak of wrestling and HOGAN WAS WRESTLING neith of those can be said for today.

2007-11-04 14:05:49 · answer #4 · answered by JAIME E 1 · 0 0

Because they want the years from 2004-2007 to suck ***, and then latter bring back the Attitude Era, and everyone will go crazy about it, and that it is finaly entertaining again, and thus they make more money. The Attitude Era is coming back Mark my Words.

2007-11-04 14:24:27 · answer #5 · answered by Lionhart Y2J 3 · 0 0

What, you expect them to miraculously pull someone with huge amounts of charisma out of thin air? It's a trying process, you have to try out new guys and see how the fans react, and even then, there's only a handful of guys with the fan appeal of the Rock or Hogan or Stone Cold.

2007-11-04 14:01:31 · answer #6 · answered by AmDrag5000 (dont stop believin) 7 · 1 0

coz WWE pass the torch to the younger ones of the generation.. the rock and triple h took it from stone cold and hbk n others and now its the orton edge batista and cena era..it will take alot of time for them to fill in the shoes of their great ones coz u dont find a new triple h,rock,stonecold,undertaker,hogan or hbk ever again..while tna has a few wwe rejects who dont have a wwe title history apart from angle whos leaving for ifl probably.

2007-11-05 02:42:01 · answer #7 · answered by THE GAME 5 · 0 0

MVP. Jeff Hardy. Kennedy. Matt Hardy. Shelton Benjamin.

They have charisma.

2007-11-04 14:43:49 · answer #8 · answered by Wrestle Obsessed™ 5 · 0 0

If you're one of those TNA fanboys, you're an idiot. WWE > TNA

I have had fanboys tell me that TNA's booking is WAY better than WWE's... Isn't that CRAZY?!

2007-11-04 14:01:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers