IF the Bush administration cooked the books to start this war and IF it can be proven, would you be at least reluctantly in favor of the impeachment of George Bush and criminal trials for any co-conspirators?
2007-11-04 12:28:30 · 11 answers · asked by Noah H 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeah I saw that on 60 minutes, you would think our government would actually take steps to verify claims by one man, instead of getting scammed and allowing us to be convinced by the Bush administration this is solid intel. Great even more proof of the complete F**kups this Bush regime has caused. I'm sure all the parents of the soldiers who have given their life are really feeling the need to "Thank" ol Bush and his buddies for this war now.
2007-11-04 12:43:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I would be reluctantly in favor of impeaching him.
"Reluctantly" because I don't think it would solve any real issues (like healthcare reform or immigration reform), it would at least show to the international community that war criminals like him finally get some kind of punishment
2007-11-04 14:11:35 · answer #2 · answered by jr_colmena 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wife watched that on tv and got real steamed
loosen up. they said nothing about the evidence of the former Iraqi vice air marshall who reported in 2005 [I think it was -- after he was released and fled Iraq] that two of their airliners had all the seats stripped out and then made a total of 88 or so flights to Syria carrying some "top secret" materials that even he wasn't permitted to know about. Same guy also said that one or two "large" truck convoys went to same area because some materials were too bulky to fit thru the planes' doors.
plus, the former head of the Iraqi atomic bomb effort escaped to America about 1995 and reported his work in a book that you can freely read at major public libraries. He plainly said that Iraq had an atomic bomb project and dismantled it, hiding the people and pieces, after losing the Kuwait war. Hint: he didn't become unemployed in 1991 but was still busy at his old tasks up until he escaped.
2007-11-04 12:43:53 · answer #3 · answered by Spock (rhp) 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Since before he moved into the Oval Office, George W. Bush knew what his assignment was. He was selected by members of the Bilderberg Conference as U.S. President for three really lame reasons:
1. The Bush family had a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein from the days of Desert Storm when George H.W. Bush was criticized, ridiculed and humiliated for 'not finishing the job' and ousting Hussein at that time;
2. Cheney wanted all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sands - at any cost;
3. The giant U.S. military-industrial complex needed a new 'war' to boost sagging profits from too many years of peace;
Bush was instructed to attack Iraq. Cheney was the puppet master. From its very first day, this unconstitutional, illegal, unjustified, immoral 'war' was all about OIL and WAR PROFITEERING. So, 675,000 Iraqis and 3,900 U.S. soldiers have died so that a handful of wealthy elitists, industrialists and power brokers can become wealthier and more powerful.
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and all their war-mongering friends deserve a special oil-soaked, blood-stained corner of Hell where they rot eternally, along with:
* 535 members of the most arrogant, incompetent, wicked, contemptible, cowardly, corrupt Republican-led Congress in U.S. history that stood by and watched Bush run rip shod over our Constitution
-AND-
* 535 members of the most arrogant, incompetent, wicked, contemptible, cowardly, corrupt Democratic-led Congress in U.S. history that promised to end this 'war' if elected, and - to date - have done nothing to keep their promise.
May God DAMN them all!!!! -RKO- 11/04/07
2007-11-04 12:46:02 · answer #4 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Don't you have anything better to do than to stir this crap up?
Bush is not going to be impeached any time soon!
Nancy Pelosi already said that it was a waste of time and not what the dems wanted to be remembered for.
Give it up already.
2007-11-04 12:34:38 · answer #5 · answered by Smoking Man 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It wasn't bogus, they found some of the WMDs and found out that the rest were shipped to Syria.
2007-11-04 13:32:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you think that curveball was the sole reason for going to war then you probably bought that "if it doesn't fit you must acquit " line too. GWB has not committed any impeachable offenses.
2007-11-04 12:32:08 · answer #7 · answered by homey 2 · 4⤊ 4⤋
He didn't...but if it's true then he should have known the minute the Clinton's opened their mouths to tell him...
2007-11-04 12:40:39 · answer #8 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
yes. but even if he didn't, he should still be impeached for the signing of executive directive 51
2007-11-04 12:30:47 · answer #9 · answered by . 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
They didn't care about truth or fiction, they were going to war no matter what
2007-11-04 12:33:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋