..it was an "inside" job. What do you think? ...and for those of you who think it was, ...please leave something or some site article to back up your reason......to at least show you have a reason to begin with. thanks
2007-11-04
12:07:34
·
16 answers
·
asked by
?
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Hey Emily,..i asked the question because there is a show on the history channel right now about it, ...so ...grow up.
2007-11-04
12:13:15 ·
update #1
I personally do not believe it was an inside job, ...not only cus i would never want to believe it could be, ..i just dont.
2007-11-04
12:15:19 ·
update #2
Inside job, NO. If it was the democrats would have been all over this from the get go. The BBC would be running this nightly. What did Bush hire a bunch of look alikes to make all the videos the terrorist made claiming responsibility. Popular mechanics and several university's did exhaustive studies and found NO, let me say again NO evidence of such.
2007-11-04 12:13:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just some thoughts to ponder. We have a multi Trillion $ defense system. To think that some guys that hide out in a cave can send some men in that cant even fly a small non commercial plane can take over 4 airliners with box cutters and fly them is absurd.
How can these cave dwellers stop NORAD. We did not have anyone to scramble these Jets? Impossible. After an hour of the 1st hijacking, an airliner can fly into the pentagon with no scramble? Come on, just think about it.
Another question. If you can answer this one, you are one unbelievable person. Why did the plane that flew into the pentagon not dive straight into it? Why did it fly all the way around it and hit it from the other side where construction was going on?
Did you know if it would of went straight on from where it was flying into the pentagon, it would have went into Rumsfield's office?
There are 2 police officers and the gas station attendant who said the plane flew on the left side of the gas station. Why does the official story say it was on the right side where there were down'd light posts? What flew on the other side that knocked them over?
If you think that they wanted to hit the weak part of the building, then explain how these non experienced pilots would have been able to handle the decline into the building and the major turn around the pentagon. Impossible for them to handle.
You can dismiss all of those but you can't dismiss this video. Bush said he say the 1st attack on the tv outside of the classroom. Only the people on the ground in NY saw the 1st attack that day. Bush says this in a couple different videos. How did bush see this?
2007-11-04 13:20:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll probably regret saying this but I don't believe it was an inside job. I do believe, judging from the number of coincidences, ie. the training missions involving our fighter jets that day, etc. that there was a mole telling them what would be the best day to attack. Since the Pentagon hires people as translators, I don't feel that this is far fetched.
It was also obvious that there were no measures taken for the FAA to deal with hijackings within the U.S. even though there had been warnings that this could be one of the plans of the terrorists. It may be that the complete failure of our government and the Pentagon to deal with this attack leads to suspicions of their involvement. Most Americans were under the impression that we were being protected until 911.
Also it was obvious that the government did not want any kind of public scrutiny of the events of that day. It took pressure by the 911 survivor families to initiate the 911 commission which was an incomplete, underfunded study.
The government, in my opinion, failed that day miserably and unbelievably but I don't think they did it.
2007-11-04 12:29:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It definitely was an "inside" job... by the people inside Al Queda. All the conspiracy theory BS put forth against the government has been refuted. The real question should be "how come they missed the intel?" It wasn't a government conspiracy - it was government incompetence, which is possibly a whole lot worse.
2007-11-04 12:13:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Paul Hxyz 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
People that think it was an "Inside Job" are paranoid, delusional, morons!!
http://zeitgeistmovie.com is a prime example of this idiotic propaganda.
Take Rosie O'Donnell is another example...
She is a lunatic who got kicked off the view for her radical statements of conspiracy theories.
These kooks will say anything to get attention and yet they only spew ignorance.
911 was a well planned operation by Al Qaeda, A fascist Muslim terrorist group headed by Osama Bin Laden.
Plain and simple.
End of story.
2007-11-04 12:15:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Smoking Man 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Those with any education can judge for themselves what happened. Taking into consideration the history of other nations and Pearl Harbor.
You have time, watch part 2 and 3 of this video..
no time, watch part 3.
part 1 can be straining for those who are deeply religious or don't have an open mind. (not meant to insult)
http://zeitgeistmovie.com/
2007-11-04 12:13:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
There is a program on the history channel right now about this very subject...I think it's a pile of crap>
2007-11-04 12:14:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ron B 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
personally i thought it was a surprise for AQ on how successful it was, no ever saw the twin towers falling!!! i mean if you knew that was going to happen why would you bother with the pentagon and the white house.
But most importantly why would a comercial country attack a trade centre, even with the insurance on the twin towers they would still lose money!!!
2007-11-04 12:20:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Beenie 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
It was not inside job. Al Qaeda claiming responsiblity and accepting kudos from other terrorist organizations is enough proof for me.
2007-11-04 12:13:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by vegaswoman 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Call Jason Bourne!!!
2007-11-04 12:11:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Papillon 7
·
3⤊
0⤋