Paris manages a company that brings in 7 million a year. She has also shown she can mingle with other countries so she has diplomatic skills and she has shown she can produce success. Hopefully she would be a rep but I would take Paris over Hillary.
2007-11-04 12:17:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by JFra472449 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I'd rather have neither and run along to Canada if either one was President. Paris is dumb enough to not know what strategies to use to garner support, and Hillary is dumb enough to try to play the gender card to make people sympathize with her. On the other hand though, Hillary is politically powerful enough to be able to be a contender for the Presidency. I would have no problem voting for a woman President, just not Hillary Clinton. Not even basing my vote on the fact that she is a woman, I think that Hillary lacks the necessary experience to be President, along with the fact that she is playing the gender card to make everyone against her look bad. She is willing to manipulate anyone (remember her false southern accent) in order to further her own agenda, and she says that the documents relating to her experience in the White House under Bill's Presidency are going to be sealed until 2012. She knows she doesn't have the experience to be able to run for the Presidency, but she continues to insist based on the fact that she is a woman. I'm in no way sexist, but I will definitely not vote for her (I'm a citizen of New York and I voted against her for the Senate for the exact same reasons). In short, she is using name recognition to obtain a title that she is in no way qualified for. She wants to turn the United States into a socialist country, which is not where I see the US going. Basically, if she gets onto the ballot, I'm voting against her just based on the fact that I KNOW she will ruin the United States (look at her botched health care program underneath her husband when he was President).
2007-11-04 12:40:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by ajfrederick9867 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Paris does not understand a thank you to communicate (plus she has no techniques)so she could be impossible to have a verbal substitute with. Hillary a minimum of has a techniques and that i understand i ought to certainly sit down down and characteristic a staggering verbal substitute together with her.
2016-10-15 01:29:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think your "philosophy" is truly lame. We've had almost eight years of a mental midget in office, and look where that's gotten us. Okay, okay, he's intellectually lazy or maybe suffering from dementia. But STILL. I'd like someone with BRAINS in the Oval Office, thank you very much.
2007-11-04 13:52:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think that's an incredibly immature way to vote. If you don't like Hillary's politics, don't vote for her. But put Paris Hilton in a room with the leaders of the world and what do you think would happen?
2007-11-04 12:06:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
Paris Hilton!!!!!
2007-11-04 13:43:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
HILLARY CLINTON!
what the hell did hillary clinton do to you to make you want to vote for paris hilton who can't think herself out of a paper bag???
2007-11-04 12:09:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by dcarcia@sbcglobal.net 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
If you're a sane person, and I truly hope you are, and regardless of your political affiliation...I truly hope you are at least intelligent enough to honestly rather have Mrs. Clinton as president.
I do not like Hillary much, but Paris Hilton?!??!? Oh my God, come on...
2007-11-04 12:08:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I actually rather not choose either of them even though a woman president would be nice.
2007-11-04 12:07:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by alperty 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
Id rather have my dog and she died over 20 years ago.
2007-11-04 12:57:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋