Bush Jr. But he will not be remembered for positive things.
2007-11-04 11:11:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by katydid 7
·
8⤊
6⤋
Simply because of 09-11-2001, Bush, Jr.
2007-11-04 19:12:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Negatively... George W...
Positively... George H.W. because he led the CIA during the cold war and successfully stopped Saddam's nuclear program by using the UN in a way it's meant to be used...
2007-11-04 19:21:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by lexintonlenny12 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
They will both be remembered as the presidents that destroyed America, and Freedom.
2007-11-04 19:54:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't really know much about Bush Senior. In history classes he was never really that important. We talk a lot about Reagan, then a lot about Clinton, not so much about Bush. I'd say Bush junior would get more, but I think in 100 years people will not really care about either of them. just like grover cleveland and people like him.
2007-11-04 19:12:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by just some chick 6
·
3⤊
6⤋
Junior ... mostly for his successful subversion of our constitution and the citizens of this country, starting a fight he could not finish... just like his dad, and selling America out to the Bilderbergs.
2007-11-04 19:20:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Shinji 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Neither, they are not a junior and senior. The question, is void.
2007-11-04 19:26:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, in the future, most people won't know the difference. They'll always get it wrong on tests, so they'll probably just be written out of the history books...especially if a future middle east gains world dominance and asserts control over the U.S.
2007-11-04 19:16:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
I think Bush Junior cause he finished the job!
2007-11-04 19:18:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brianne 7
·
2⤊
6⤋
Yeah, like John Tyler
2007-11-04 19:15:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lotus Phoenix 6
·
0⤊
4⤋