which is the greater threat against world peace and stability, a nuclear Pakistan or a nuclear wannabe Iran?

Answer 1

Pakistan. Expecially under the Musharrif government, which is corrupt enough to sell the damned things if he's offered the right price.

Even if Iran gets the bomb, the Israelis will launch a pre-emptive strike with the nukes everybody's been pretending since the 60's that they don't have.

It never ceases to amaze me that there are still gullible enough to believe that the Rosenbergs would give the secret of the H-Bomb to the Soviets and not give it to Israel too.

Even if the Iranis did develop a bomb and smuggled it into New York under Diplomatic Seal, they have to know that any US President would turn their Country into a sheet of glass.

Answer 2

More fodder for the thumbs down crowd, but neither one of those you mention, the biggest threat to world peace is the United States, or Israel.
Who else has been running around the world, bombing nations at will, and demanding that everyone abide by their demands. Plus making threats against nations such as Iran that so far has not been proven to have violated it's obligations under the NPF treaty, only accusations by the United States. I guess after the wmd's in Iraq, we all know how much truth we can expect out of Washington.

Answer 3

ask your self what share united states's back interior the 30's concept Hitler grew to become right into a tremendously intense-high quality guy? This guy Ahmadinejad is undesirable information, you do no longer could desire to attend ten years to make a nuclear weapon all it takes is a few C-4 and a few enriched uranium in a suitcase and chum you have a weapon of mass destruction. is this impossible, merely look at what is going on at our southern boarders in the event that they could carry in a lot of unlawful drugs into our united states how complicated will this is to hold in a small kit crammed with destruction. Iran has been on the leading fringe of terrorism for some years, They no longer in common terms furnish weapons and fiscal help to the insurgents in Iraq yet to different center eastern international places to boot. so a ways as a mis interpretation of wiping Israel off the map, i'm effective he grew to become into no longer extending an olive branch, that's certainly prevalent that Iran has deep hatred no longer in common terms for Israel yet additionally the united states. i do no longer agree that Iran does not pose any armed forces danger , what's it going to take to open the eyes of a few human beings to the actual indisputable fact that this guy is a unfastened cannon. till Iran is keen to to bypass to the negotiating table and act as to blame member of a international community a plan for armed forces action could desire to be left on the table.

Answer 4

That's a good question and tough. Since the Pakistanis are friends, I'd have to go with Iran. The thing that got me was Libya gave up their program and shipped the N Koreans home, but Iran has been plugging along. I am not sure who backed the NKs. Take care.

Answer 5

To world peace? Neither of them. Their rockets go how far? When they invest a trillion dollars to create their own version of NASA then world peace might be an issue.
As of now their technology is based on conventional missiles limited to a range in the Persian Gulf, and middle east.

Answer 6

Iran

Answer 7

Both Iran and pakistan are no threat. There is no proof Iran is looking for nuclear weapons. against who would they use such weapons? Israel the US ? Iranians aren't that stupid, they know they would endure complete anhilation doing so..

The greatest threat to peace is the US because it is the main purveyer of violence and terrorism in the world

Answer 8

a war mongering America if you ask me