Of course. Next to Ronald Reagan he's the finest president in our history. In spite of the rabid and unfounded attacks against him by the Democrats, he's been doing exactly what he's supposed to do, which is govern. He's unswayed by public opinion, which is just how he should be. He is a true statesman in every sense of the word. As Arnold said about how the aftermath of the fires was going, "You may hate it, but we're doing just fine." The same with Bush - no matter how much people lay on the floor, kicking and screeching, Bush is doing a good job and won't be turned away from his correct course of action.
2007-11-04 09:42:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
He, Cheney and Rumsfeld should have been taken out and shot for treason if we had ACTUALLY had an impartial transparent investigation into 911!
Why was the 20th 911 hijacker in FBI custody for weeks and the plot not foiled?
Why did FBI HQ deny FISA warrants requested by Minneapolis office in weeks prior to 911?
What executive orders did Bush issue to ensure Americas national security AFTER receiving the PDB of 8/6/2001?
2007-11-04 16:35:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by honestamerican 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
NO, if Joe Biden were the Dem candidate I would vote for him. I won't vote for any of the other Dem candidates, so I would vote for a third party candidate if it were W. Bush vs. Shillary or Nobama.
2007-11-04 16:36:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Shane 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes, I would vote for him. I admit, yes he has made his mistakes, but I would say that anybody that has had to deal with the stuff that he had to deal with probably would not have dealt with it much better. The only reason Hillary wants our troops home is because she is a woman and women are soft at heart when we hear of our men dying over there. If it wasn't for this war, I honestly don't think Bush had done that bad of job. Everyone just hates him because of this war. I want our troops to come home too, but only when the war is completely over and and we know the US will not get attacked again as soon as we pull out of Iraq.
2007-11-04 16:26:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Laughing with you not at you 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
Yes, like it or not I would have to vote for him again.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-11-04 22:14:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Never voted for him, never will. No dem wants to be like GWB. Come to think of it no republican wants to be like him either.
2007-11-04 16:22:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
If he was running against Hillary Clinton I would have no choice but to vote for him again, just like 2004......
2007-11-04 16:21:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brian 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
IN A HEARTBEAT SINCE ALL OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY CANDIDATES ARE A BUNCH OF AMERICA HATERS ANY HOW.
2007-11-05 12:47:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not happy with a lot he's done, but compared to the garbage in the running, he's a saint.
2007-11-04 16:33:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by John in AZ 4
·
4⤊
3⤋
Yes, he is better than any of the other top-tier GOP candidates...and A LOT better than the Democrats.
2007-11-04 16:23:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dude #2369™ 4
·
4⤊
3⤋