NO, abortion is bad and it is better to kill him after he has done something to deserve the death penalty.
2007-11-04 08:02:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
No, my ethics are not situational.
Actually, Boss H, the problem with this question is that the asker has addressed the wrong audience. Conservatives do not seek an argument to justify abortion, so why would this question affect us in any way? It serves only to reveal once again the distorted reality in which Liberals live.
2007-11-04 16:14:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bush Sr. armed OBL! Have you forgotten Jim-may Carter funded Afganeestannee too.
2007-11-04 16:09:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The problem with this kind of question, is that you are asking people who have only black and white views of reality, to think outside their box.
If you already know what he is going to do, without a shadow of a doubt, he has already commited the act in your time. This means allowing it to continue means subjecting the inocence to the experiences that have turned him into what he is now. BUT, if you sent him as an innocent directly to whatever God welcomes inocent into his kingdom, wouldn;t that be one soul saved?
Shouldn't ask them this type of question, because they will only view it as an attack on their abortion stance.
2007-11-04 16:08:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Boss H 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
As much as I would want to,at that time he was innocent and that would not be what we stand for.It would be wrong.It's choices like that,that define whom we are.I wonder if something in his life would have changed him,would he have been different,thats why you cant make a decision like that,we all learn to become ourselves,defined by the choices we make,and he made a very bad one
2007-11-04 16:04:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by stygianwolfe 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
I like this. Let's see if they answer or just beat around the bush.
Hehe, I'll be an interested spectator here.
My opinion- since the morality issue behind abortion is completely debatable, it should stay a choice. And so, yes, to answer the question. Although, I must say, I am neither a con nor a repub.
EDIT: Well, now. It seems they are trying their hardest to not look like hypocrites (for once), but I know deep down they are not giving their honest answer.
2007-11-04 16:02:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
6⤋
Why do that? The NEOCONS need him, to blame 9-11 on! Because if you don't know that fact, you just are not paying attention!(and no, I'm not a republican/conservative),I am an AMERICAN!
2007-11-04 16:17:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by studdmuffynn 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why, that would be punishment for a criminal act not yet committed - sounds like "Minority Report" to me. Is that something YOU advocate?
2007-11-04 16:11:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
We may have already aborted the person that would have stopped Bin Laden. We'll never know but, we do know abortion is murder.
2007-11-04 16:06:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by theantilib 4
·
4⤊
4⤋
Boss H has got it exactly right
2007-11-04 16:11:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by golfer7 5
·
1⤊
1⤋