will it be determined to be unconstitutional? should all or no States apportion their votes to the EC?
2007-11-04 07:52:51 · 5 answers · asked by amazed we've survived this l 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The national uproar it would cause is hard to imagine. Every other state, especially large ones, would have no choice but to do the same. Eventually it would be pretty much the equivalent of a strictly popular vote with no electoral college, which might not be such a bad idea, but might well be unconstitutional
2007-11-04 08:06:58 · answer #1 · answered by golfer7 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Although I would applaud apportioning if it were universal, it's wrong to do it to benefit one party only.
What would really be nice would be to live in a country where we actually got to vote for our leaders.
In representative dfemocracies, the person with the most votes wins. If we'd lived in one of those, we wouldn't have had the Brutal Moron as dictator for all these years.
Edit after actually reading the question: Will it? Not likely; California is pretty solidly blue, Governators notwithstanding.
2007-11-04 11:12:46 · answer #2 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
By attempting this in the largest state to vote for the Democrats, this issue is shown to be a partisan attempt to dilute the votes going to the other side.
Let them try it in Texas first.
2007-11-04 07:58:17 · answer #3 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Texas better do the same
2007-11-04 07:56:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That would be way too sensical to ever happen. But I would mind.
2007-11-04 07:58:45 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋